
Mason
|
|
John Mason, BP Exploration Operating Company
Drilling & Completion / September 2007 Volume 22 Issue No. 3
EE Editorial:
A question I was asked recently is “How do Health, Safety and
Environmental (HSE) issues fit into technical journals like SPE Drilling &
Completion, or into any of the other SPE publications?”
For many
of us, HSE issues are an important daily focus and year on year they become a
bigger part of the working day. We see more thorough and systematic incident
investigations, wider circulations of workplace incident reports, and there is
more visibility of lessons learned. With HSE being an integral part of
everyone’s business, how should technical journals like SPEDC embrace
HSE issues? The answer, I think, is that almost every paper already does
embrace HSE issues; therefore, the question is more about the individual’s
interpretation of the term “HSE issues”.
Taking a
narrower perspective of HSE, the latest statistics on incidents and near
misses, safety flashes, investigation reports, wellsite initiatives or changes
to competency qualifications do not really fit into a technical journal such as
SPEDC. However, a wider (and I think better) perspective is that HSE
issues encompass anything we do to improve the efficiency of our drilling and
completion business. Taking a wider perspective, striving for continuous
improvement in HSE performance can be seen as a foundation for almost
everything we do. Improved efficiency means more accurate and accessible
information, fewer people on wellsites, less waste discharged, fewer unplanned
events, fewer equipment failures, fewer and more productive wells, less energy
to construct each well, fewer interventions, more reliable completions for life
of the field and more reliable abandonments for life of the planet.
This
edition offers you eight peer-reviewed technical papers, all of which speak to
improved drilling and completion efficiency and so to improved HSE
performance.
How does
HSE relate to a technical paper about improvements in drilling fluids?
Deepwater Drilling Made More Efficient and Cost-Effective Using the
Microflux Control Method and an Ultralow Invasion Fluid to Open the Mud-Weight
Window. A drilling fluid with better fluid loss control and better rheology
control will contribute to fewer well control incidents for a narrow pore-frac
gradient wellbore. This means improvements in safety.
Establishing better industry standards to allow more confidence in
apples-for-apples comparisons of drilling fluid performance is presented in
Modernization of the API Recommended Practice on Rheology and
Hydraulics: Creating Easy Access to Integrated Wellbore Fluids
Engineering. Better standards provide a more robust basis for engineering
the optimum drilling fluids for a well and helping to deliver more productive
wells with improved wellsite safety.
Losing a high cost BHA and then spending the extra rig time for sidetracking is
costly, hazardous, and inefficient. Sidetracking also results in unpleasant
problems like handling swarf from section milling, nuclear sources left
downhole and high doglegs. Losing a hole section is still too frequent and
anything to help reduce well bore problems gives a direct benefit to HSE
performance. A Rapid, Rigsite-Deployable, Electrochemical Test for
Evaluating the Membrane Potential of Shales aims to reduce the occurrence
of well bore stability problems.
Use of
Real-Time Rig Sensor Data to Improve Daily Drilling Reporting, Benchmarking and
Planning—A Case Study looks at improving the value of drilling data to
better diagnose, understand, and improve drilling performance. The point is
well made that vast amounts of data are available, but typically, little is
done with the data. Pressure Prediction and Drilling Challenges in a
Deepwater Subsalt Well from Offshore Nova Scotia, Canada shows how the
understanding of uncertainty in key subsurface data has a direct influence on
well design, drilling practices, and well site safety.
Sandface Completion for a Shallow Laminated Gas Pay with High Fines
Content presents techniques that have improved well productivity in a
challenging reservoir’s architecture. In such fields, sandface completion
design can be the most important lever to unlock reserves and so enable
commercial field developments.
Optimization of Well Performance in a Selective Subsea Sand-Control
Completion, Offshore Nigeria provides a second example of understanding
well productivity problems and delivering improvements to commercial value and
HSE performance.
Marco
Polo Tension Leg Platform: Deepwater Completion Performance presents a
variety of best practice activities in the delivery of deepwater
completions.
I
encourage you to digest the one or two papers that most interest you, think
about how the information might improve the efficiency of your business, and
use the spe.org online discussion forum to ask the authors for any
clarifications or further details. As always, comments are welcome;
John.mason2@bp.com.
|