
Warpinski
|
|
Norm Warpinski, Pinnacle Technologies
The issue of commercialism is one that comes up often during the review
process for papers submitted to the SPE journals. There are many examples of
commercialistic papers that anyone can spot immediately. These papers are
written more like sales brochures, with names of products plastered all over.
It is easy to deal with these papers: DECLINED. However, there are also many
papers that are much more subtly commercialistic, and these are an entirely
different matter. It is usually these papers that give technical, associate,
and executive editors headaches.
There are no set guidelines for what is commercialistic, so it is up to the
editors to try to sort it out. Although I believe that we usually get it right,
there are probably occasional papers where we do not. The following are some of
my thoughts on commercialism.
If a paper is using a commercial reservoir simulator, a fracture model, or
other software products, it is clear that the type of model used must be
referenced. In many cases, I think it may be appropriate to name that model
once in the paper, but continued use of the name would tend to have the
appearance of commercialism. Because the actual model used may have some
bearing on the type of results that are obtained, it may be especially
important that the reader know the model by its name, not just by some
often-obscure reference. Although the use of only one model would also appear
to be promotional, I do not think that it is realistic to request that papers
use more than one model; the authors have obviously chosen a select model
because they feel that it is the most appropriate or most efficient to
use.
If the authors are describing a new chemical or hardware product, the rules on
names tend to get fuzzier. For some reason, naming these products in a paper
always seems more promotional. Nevertheless, I think that the same rules should
apply to chemicals, tools, and other equipment as they do to software. If a
description and test data of a new product are worth publishing (otherwise, we
would not be worrying about these issues), then the readers need to know what
it is called if they want to try it. There may not be any reference available
if it is a new product. At most, name the product once and avoid using the name
again.
SPE’s policy is to avoid all commercial references, so the above comments are
only my opinion of how to give the reader sufficient information while avoiding
commercialism as much as possible. It really is a delicate balance.
Another wide-ranging lineup of papers appears in this issue of SPE
Production & Operations. The first four papers deal with various
aspects of oilfield chemistry. Development and Field Use of a Novel
Solvent/Water Emulsion for the Removal of Asphaltene Deposits in Fractured
Carbonate Formations is a discussion of the selection, development,
testing, and optimization of a water-solvent emulsion system for asphaltene
removal. In Case Studies of Emulsion Behavior at Reservoir Conditions,
the authors have developed a visual PVT cell to observe emulsion-phase behavior
at reservoir conditions, and they apply these results to two case studies with
suspected emulsion problems. Productivity Impairment From Kaolinite
Mobilization: Laboratory and Field Experience, Oseberg Sør is a coreflow
and field-test study of scale-inhibitor and drilling-mud formation damage on
reservoir rocks from a complex offshore reservoir. The fourth paper, Squeeze
Chemical for HT Applications--Have We Discarded Promising Products by
Performing Unrepresentative Thermal-Aging Tests?, discusses an interesting
experiment that evaluates scale-inhibitor effectiveness in cores compared to
the standard procedure for aging a bulk solution; the results show a
significant increase in inhibitor effectiveness when in contact with the rock
matrix.
The next two papers deal with acid stimulation. In The Texture of
Acidized Fracture Surfaces: Implications for Acid Fracture Conductivity, a
new profilometer was developed to measure the small-scale etching that occurs
with different acid systems and under varying environmental and fluid
conditions. Reaction of Gelled Acids With Calcite is a study in which a
rotating-disk apparatus is used to examine dissolution rates and etching
patterns of gelled-acid systems.
Hydraulic fracturing is the topic of the following two papers. A Holistic
Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Hydraulic-Fracture Treatments in Tight
Gas Reservoirs is a poroelastic evaluation of the stress changes induced by
production and the potential for fracture reorientation with a second fracture
treatment. In A Field Study in Optimizing Completion Strategies for Fracture
Initiation in Barnett Shale Horizontal Wells, the authors examined hundreds
of horizontal Barnett shale wells to identify the causes of near-wellbore
fracture-initiation problems and offer solutions to correct them.
Wellbore operation is the subject of two additional papers. In Repeatedly
Increased Efficiency and Success Rate From a New Solids-Cleanout Process Using
Coiled Tubing: A Review of Recent Achievements From More Than 100
Operations, the authors discuss the results and lessons learned on
solids-cleanout operations by use of wiper-trip methodologies, particularly
with respect to large-diameter deviated wells. Production Optimization by
Use of the Capillary Technology in the Loma La Lata Field is a discussion
of the use of capillary string system both for injection of chemicals and for
the deployment of gauges.
The final two papers deal with complex production operation issues.
Challenges for Waterflooding in a Deepwater Environment is a
wide-ranging discussion dealing with injectivity, H2S, scale,
corrosion, hydrates, and surface and subsurface development plans for deepwater
fields. Application of Relative Permeability Modifiers To Control Water Cut
Following Hydraulic Fracturing in Western Siberia Oil Fields--Russian
Case-History Study examines post-fracturing production in high-water-cut
oil wells that have been treated with relative-permeability modifiers.
I would like to thank the authors for their great contributions.
|