
Dean Oliver
|
|
Dean Oliver, University of Oklahoma, Norman
Because the vast majority of Society of Petroleum Engineers members work for
industry, the focus of the Society is often on the applied and practical
aspects of the discipline. The focus of SPE Journal, however, is on the
fundamental science related to petroleum engineering, so it should not be
surprising to discover that the authors of papers in SPEJ reflect quite
a different composition than the Society as a whole. If we segregate authors
into three categories of employers, the breakdown of employers of first authors
over the past 2.5 years is approximately as follows: 22% industry, 4% national
laboratories, and 74% universities. The classification is not precise, as in
several cases, the affiliation of the first author is listed as industry, but I
have classified the author as being with a university if the work was clearly
performed during the PhD process. The large number of papers written by authors
from universities can probably be explained by the focus of SPEJ on
fundamental research in the science of petroleum engineering. Many of the
university-authored papers are written by PhD candidates who are required to
develop new technologies and are sometimes required to publish in a
peer-reviewed journal before completion of their PhD. Although it is clear that
some companies do reward their employees for publications, many of the
manuscripts that are submitted by industry are not fundamental in nature and
hence are not suitable for SPEJ.
A second way of classifying papers is by the location of employment of the
first author at the time of submitting the manuscript. Approximately 71% of the
SPEJ papers in the past 2.5 years were written by authors whose
employment (or location of study) was North America, 1% were employed in South
America, 22% were located in Europe, and 6% were employed in the Middle East.
Because of the multinational nature of SPE, the lack of diversity in the
locations of author employment is somewhat more surprising than the dominance
of academia over industry in SPEJ authorship. What we see, in fact, is
the impact of a relatively small number of universities (approximately 10) in
North America and Europe that turn out fairly large numbers of PhD students
each year. Interestingly, although these universities are located in North
America and Europe, the students who are often the first authors are the
citizens of many countries throughout the world. Note, for example, that while
papers from Chinese universities were poorly represented in the past 2.5 years,
almost 30% of the manuscripts were authored by someone of Chinese background.
Similar discrepancies exist for authors from Africa and Latin America.
The large changes in the petroleum industry in the past 30 years are also
reflected in the changes in authorship. Table 1 compares the
distribution of author affiliations from 1997 with the current distribution.
Two changes are fairly remarkable. The first is the complete reversal of the
positions of industry and universities with respect to authorship of
fundamental research. That change was presumably precipitated by the closure of
many industrial petroleum research laboratories in the 1980s and 90s. Those
that did not close often changed their emphasis to technical support. Those
changes were accompanied by a shift in research funding from the corporation,
which often had long-term goals, to the business units, which typically had
shorter term goals. The second major change is the location of employment of
authors. In 1977, all first authors were located in the US, Canada, or Mexico.
Today, almost 30% of the first authors are from continents other than North
America. This change is certainly welcome.
With this issue, you may notice a change in the titles of members of the
Editorial Review Board; Review Chairs have become Associate Editors. This
change reflects more accurately the responsibilities of the Editorial Board for
SPEJ and is more consistent with the titles at other journals.
SPEJ currently has approximately 34 Associate Editors. Each editor
handles 5–10 papers per year. Their primary responsibilities are to determine
whether or not a manuscript is suitable for SPEJ, to identify
appropriate reviewers, and to request that they review the manuscript. When
reviews are returned, the Associate Editor summarizes the recommendations of
the reviewers and recommends a decision to the Executive Editor. Critical
qualities of Associate Editors are familiarity with the review process,
expertise in at least one area of petroleum engineering, a network of potential
reviewers, and a degree of tact. With this issue we welcome Jing Wan of
ExxonMobil Production Research as a new Associate Editor. She brings expertise
in the areas of simulation, well performance, geomechanics, completions design,
and upscaling.
| TABLE 1--AUTHOR AFFILIATION FOR PAPERS
PUBLISHED IN SPEJ |
| | University | Industry | National Lab | N/A | Other |
| 2006--2008 | 74% | 22% | 4% | 71% | 29% |
| 1977 | 25% | 68% | 7% | 100% | 0% |
|