
Kovscek
|
|
Anthony R. Kovscek, Stanford University
This issue of SPE Journal contains a broad range of topics related to
carbon dioxide, gas injection and production, and reservoir geomechanics, as
well as reactions in porous media. The concept for an issue with a focus on
CO2-related topics emerged more than a year ago. While SPE
Journal has published manuscripts related to CO2-enhanced
oil recovery (EOR) and gas injection on a regular basis, there has been a
steady uptick in submissions with different focuses. In this issue, papers
range from EOR, CO2 sequestration, experimental measurement of
relative permeability, CO2-induced mineralization, well cements in
CO2-rich environments, salt deposition around wells, and similar
topics.
With respect to CO2, it seems that members of the Society,
through their research, have embraced CO2 in the subsurface nearly
in its entirety. Given the current and growing importance of CO2 EOR
as well as the potential importance of carbon sequestration in geological
structures and enhanced gas recovery, this is an important undertaking of the
research community. Of note in this issue are the six manuscripts relating to
chemical reactions in porous media. While some of these manuscripts are
traditional in the sense that they are concerned with formation acidizing, the
remainder relate to the interaction of CO2-laden brine with well
cements and mineralization within the formation. The complete cycle of
CO2 from injection to migration within a geological structure to
immobilization and to mineralization is under consideration.
What I find interesting on a personal level is the nonconventional spectrum
of topics investigated. Some of the papers that readers will find in this issue
examine the transport behavior and the very nature of CO2 and
natural gas within tight rocks such as shales and coal. Shale gas and its host
shale porous medium have been the source of much interest lately. For
geological carbon sequestration, this medium has been virtually ignored until
the very recent past. We have spoken of depleted oil and gas reservoirs, saline
aquifers, and unmineable coal beds as geological storage sites. Sequestration
capacity of these geological settings alone has been estimated, through with a
great range of variability. Of course, much more work is needed; however, it
may well be shown that the potential for CO2 storage in shale is
vast. Coupled with this sequestration potential is the reality that the
recovery factors for natural gas from shale are rather low to date. It is not
difficult to envision a recovery process that injects CO2 into gas
shale as a means of enhancing gas recovery with a byproduct of CO2
storage. The research and engineering effort will be significant to realize
such a vision, but the task has begun, as reported in this issue.
In closing this final issue of 2011, I would like to extend my sincere
thanks to the Associate Editors (AEs) of SPE Journal. You will find
their names at the front of the print version and also online, listed on the main SPE
Journal page. Your AEs do the hard work of soliciting reviews, making
sure that high-quality reviews get delivered, and synthesizing a recommendation
from those reviews. Without their efforts, SPE Journal would not turn
around the first reviews and decisions on manuscripts in roughly 100 days as we
do now. The service of AEs is invaluable to this journal, and has not gone
unnoticed.
Thank you for reading. I hope that you enjoy this issue and its 25
papers.
|