Summary
Implementation of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological
media requires a proper assessment of the risk of CO2 leakage from
storage sites. Leakage pathways may exist through and along wellbores, which
may penetrate or be near to the storage site. One method of assessing the
potential for CO2 leakage through wells is by mining databases that
usually reside with regulatory agencies. These agencies collect data concerning
wellbore construction, oil and gas production, and other regulated issues for
existing wells. The Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB), the
regulatory agency in Alberta, Canada, collects and stores information about
more than 315,000 oil, gas, and injection wells in the province of Alberta. The
ERCB also records well leakage at the surface as surface-casing-vent flow
(SCVF) through wellbore annuli and gas migration (GM) outside casing, as
reported by the industry.
The evaluation of a leakage pathway through wellbore casing or annuli and
what causes these wellbore leaks are the first step in determining what factors
may contribute to wellbore leakage from CO2-storage sites. By using
available data, major factors that contribute to wellbore leakage were
identified.
Data analysis shows that there is a correlation between these SCVF/GM and
economic activity, technology changes, geographic location, and regulatory
changes regarding well completion and abandonment. Further analysis indicates a
relationship between low-annular-cement top, external corrosion, casing
failure, and wellbore leakage (SCVF/GM). Other factors that could affect the
presence of wellbore leakage, such as wellbore deviation, surface-casing depth,
and wellbore density, were also investigated.
This paper presents the findings of the data analysis and a method to
evaluate the potential for leakage along wells in an area where CO2
storage is intended. This information is useful not only for future operations
of CO2 storage in geological media, but also for current operations
relating to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons.
© 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
3,744 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
8 January 2007
- Meeting paper published:
5 March 2007
- Revised manuscript received:
9 April 2008
- Manuscript approved:
26 May 2008
- Published online:
16 March 2009
- Version of record:
1 March 2009