SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 24, Number 2, June 2009, pp. 301-310

SPE-107903-PA

Implementation of a Shock and Vibration Mitigation Process: Achieving Real-Time Solutions and Savings

View full textPDF ( 1,652 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/107903-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/107903-PA

Citation

  • Akinniranye, G., Megat, A., Elsweisy, H., Palacio, J., Poedjono, B., and Goobie, R. 2009. Implementation of a Shock and Vibration Mitigation Process: Achieving Real-Time Solutions and Savings. SPE Drill & Compl  24 (2): 301-310. SPE-107903-PA. doi: 10.2118/107903-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 1.2.3 Torque/Drag Modeling, BHA Performance Prediction
  • 1.3.1 Wellbore Integrity/Geomechanics
  • 1.2.1 Bit Selection, Performance
  • 1.2.2 Drillstring Design

Keywords

  • shock, vibration, S&V, BHA, RSS, mitigation

Summary

Worldwide, the costs associated with the exploration and production of oil have increased almost exponentially in the past 5 years. This sharp rise in daily costs has also led to a new urgency from operators to find more-reliable and -efficient ways of doing business.

Shock and vibration (S&V) are the leading causes of failure for measurement-while-drilling (MWD) and rotary-steerable systems today. These failures have a major impact on operators and service companies, costing millions of dollars in repairs and hours of rig time.

To better understand downhole dynamics, a wide variety of service companies now offer lateral, axial, and transverse-shock measurements, along with downhole rev/min (RPM) readings. In the best case, these measurements offer a reactive method of drilling, and in the worst case, they provide no help in solving the problem or in preventing damage to the bottomhole assembly (BHA).

For S&V measurements to be effective, operators and service companies must work together to create a comprehensive process that includes each phase of drilling--planning, execution, and evaluation. An S&V standard combined with increased client awareness and education has allowed a new level of success to be achieved at the rigsite. Now, S&V issues at the rig can be identified in real time and monitored remotely from an operations-support center. This communication structure, coupled with prejob planning and modeling and the capture of post-run lessons learned, can be used to offer solutions when problems arise, thereby preventing damage to the BHA, reducing rig non-productive time (NPT), and improving the rate of penetration (ROP).

View full textPDF ( 1,652 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 17 May 2007
  • Meeting paper published: 11 March 2007
  • Revised manuscript received: 29 April 2008
  • Manuscript approved: 6 May 2008
  • Published online: 1 June 2009
  • Version of record: 1 June 2009