Summary
Usual practice in drilling engineering is to determine drilling-fluid
density at surface conditions assuming that drilling-fluid density does not
change with changing downhole conditions. This assumption may result in
inaccuracy while estimating static and dynamic pressures in the wellbore,
especially when synthetic-based drilling fluids are used. Inaccurate estimation
of the pressure profile in the annulus can lead to severe well problems such as
kicks, drilling-fluid losses, and wellbore instability. In addition, inaccurate
pressure-profile estimation can affect the success of managed-pressure-drilling
(MPD) operations, which require real-time knowledge of wellbore pressures to
keep wellbore pressure between formation pore and fracture pressures using a
control choke placed on the return line of the annulus.
Effects of pressure and temperature on volumetric behavior of two
olefin-based synthetic oils are investigated in this study using a mercury-free
pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) system. The olefin-based synthetic oils used
in this study are C16C18 internal olefin (IO) and C12C14 linear alpha olefin
(LAO). To simulate deep offshore situations, the temperature is ranged between
25 and 175°C, while the pressure is ranged between 0 and 14,000 psig.
In addition, volumetric performances of olefin-based synthetic-oil systems
under investigation are compared with those of water, brine solution, mineral
oil, diesel oil, and n-paraffin-based oil under similar conditions.
The study shows that the volumetric properties of synthetic-based oils are
more sensitive to pressure and temperature conditions compared to water, brine
solutions, mineral oil, and diesel oil. Once emulsion systems containing
synthetic-based oils are used, density change with respect to downhole
conditions should be modeled to increase the reliability of pressure-profile
calculations.
© 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
828 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
28 February 2007
- Meeting paper published:
16 April 2007
- Revised manuscript received:
7 August 2008
- Manuscript approved:
21 August 2008
- Published online:
1 June 2009
- Version of record:
1 June 2009