Summary
Smart, horizontal, and multilateral wells provide an attractive option for
maximizing reservoir contact in both oil and gas fields in Saudi Arabia.
Formate drill-in fluid has been selected lately for drilling gas wells because
of its ability to preserve conventional polymers at high temperatures. The
formate salts also can reduce the rate of hydrolytic and oxidative degradation
of many viscosifiers and fluid loss agents at high temperatures.
Drilling fluid filter cake can reduce the flow efficiency of cased or
openhole wells. Calcium carbonate particles are frequently used as weighting
material to maintain the pressure that is required for well control and
minimize the leakoff. Such solids become consolidated and trapped in the
polymeric material and this makes the filter cake a strong permeability
barrier.
The conventional method for cleaning the filter cake is by circulating
solids-free formate brines at a high flow rate. This mechanical technique
removes only the external drilling fluid damage. Chemical fluids like acids,
oxidizers, or chelating agents are usually used as an alternative method for
dissolving both the external and internal filter cake. Most of these fluids
cannot give a full coverage to the wellbore because of the formation
heterogeneity.
A new class of esters can generate an acid downhole at a low rate and
distribute it uniformly through the wellbore. Fluid compatibility and thermal
stability tests were studied in detail. Return permeability experiments were
conducted by using high-pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) dynamic fluid loss
cells. The ester solution was effective in cleaning the filter cake in
comparison to the formate brines completion fluid and other organic acids
results. Also, circulating formate brine to restore the wellbore permeability
or remove the internal filter-cake damage was found to be insufficient. Surface
tension measurements indicated that the generated alcohol and lactic acid from
the ester solution had lowered the surface tension more than the formate
brines.
© 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,242 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
31 August 2007
- Meeting paper published:
30 October 2007
- Manuscript approved:
2 April 2009
- Published online:
17 September 2009
- Version of record:
14 June 2010