Summary
Expandable tubulars provide exciting new opportunities for well design and
construction. This technology has permitted access to hydrocarbons that could
not be reached by conventional drilling techniques. Design tools similar to
those available for conventional oil-country tubular goods (OCTG) are required
to facilitate further dissemination and application of expandable tubulars. In
particular, equations for performance properties of expanded pipe are
needed.
This paper describes a method for developing an equation for the design
collapse strength of any particular expandable-pipe product. It is based on the
combination of collapse-test data and theoretical modeling, and its statistical
approach is fully consistent with that used for conventional OCTG described in
ISO/TR 10400:2007 (2007) or API TR 5C3 (2008).
On the basis of an example set of expanded L80 pipes, results are presented
fitting the collapse data with an anisotropic version of the Klever and Tamano
(KT) collapse equation (Klever and Tamano 2006) that has been calibrated
recently to conventional OCTG. By adapting three parameters, the anisotropic KT
model can also model the collapse strength of the expanded-pipe data over a
range of pipe diameters, wall thicknesses, and expansion ratios. The historical
API BULL 5C3 (1994) collapse formulas, even with adapted
plastic-collapse parameters and reduced yield strength (YS), were found not
suitable for matching this set of expanded-pipe collapse data.
Manufacturers may use the procedure described in this paper to develop
design strength equations for specific expandable-pipe products, leading to
product-specific sets of best-fit KT model parameters. The new equation takes
account of the theoretical effect of internal pressure and axial load on
collapse. The API SC5 RG ET Resource Group on expandable tubulars is
incorporating the approach presented in this paper into the draft API RP 5-EX
Recommended Practice.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,064 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
14 May 2009
- Meeting paper published:
5 March 2008
- Revised manuscript received:
14 November 2009
- Manuscript approved:
18 November 2009
- Published online:
20 May 2010
- Version of record:
13 September 2010