SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 24, Number 3, September 2009, pp. 452-455

SPE-114829-PA

A New Fracture Model That Includes Load History, Temperature, and Poisson's Effects

View full textPDF ( 257 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/114829-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114829-PA

Citation

  • Aadnoy, B.S. and Belayneh, M. 2009. A New Fracture Model That Includes Load History, Temperature, and Poisson’s Effects. SPE Drill & Compl  24 (3): 452-455. SPE-114829-PA. doi: 10.2118/114829-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 1.3.1 Wellbore Integrity/Geomechanics
  • 1.7 Fundamental Research in Drilling & Completions

Summary

The fracture equation used in the oil industry is derived from the Kirsch equation for the hoop stress. Because of its simplicity, it is almost exclusively used for the prediction of fracture initiation pressures. However, it is not useful for analysis of load history.

An analytic study was undertaken to model load history leading to the fracturing of the borehole. To use the model, initial conditions must be established, given by the virgin in-situ stress state and the pore pressure, followed by the load history and the temperature history. Imposing a volumetric strain balance, a new fracturing equation is developed. Because the borehole is loaded in the radial direction, causing tension in the tangential direction, a Poisson's effect arises. In addition, the general solution includes effects of temperature history.

Example cases will show the improvement with the new model. The first case compares the new load-history fracture model with the Kirsch solution. The Poisson's scaling factor in the new solution leads to a higher fracture pressure than the conventional solution. This may explain some of the discrepancy between models and field data. The second case investigates the thermal effects by comparing the fracture pressure for the drilling phase with a hot-production phase and a cold-water-injection phase.

It is believed that by including the pressure and temperature load history, a better assessment of the fracture strength is obtained, leading to better predictions.

Introduction

Basis for the Model. Although the Kirsch solution for stresses in a circular hole was published more than 100 years ago, it was not untill 1980 that borehole mechanics started being applied to petroleum drilling. At that time, deviated wells were evolving, and because of the complexity, high inclination, and increasing length of these, borehole stability was identified as a critical factor. Bradley (1979) is considered the person that introduced application of classical mechanics into the petroleum industry by analyzing borehole fracturing and collapse in deviated boreholes. Later, Aadnoy and Chenevert (1987) presented the mathematical framework and elaborated on the applications. These early works still form the basis for modern wellbore-stability analyses.

Continuing work, the past two decades have of course led to many contributions to the classical solutions. A full review will not be given here, but Fjaer et al. (1992) serves as a good general reference. More recently, Aadnoy and Belayneh (2004) have shown that the boundary condition given by the drilling fluid can be better represented as an elastoplastic barrier. The temperature effects are identified as having effect on the fracture pressure. Examples are given by Maury and Sauzay (1987) and Maury and Guenot (1995). A more recent paper by Gil et al. (2006) considers the temperature issues from a poroelastic and "stress-cage" perspective.

The variable in the solution is the borehole pressure, which causes the borehole to be loaded in the radial direction. However, the solution used today does not include the full Poisson's effect (i.e., the effects in the tangential and axial direction of a radial loading). The objective of this paper is to include this effect. In the following, we will present the resulting expression for the new model, which is derived in the Appendix.

View full textPDF ( 257 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 7 May 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 25 August 2008
  • Revised manuscript received: 12 September 2008
  • Manuscript approved: 3 October 2008
  • Published online: 16 July 2009
  • Version of record: 28 September 2009