SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 25,
Number 2,
June 2010,
pp. 223-229
Summary
Given the potentially catastrophic human and environmental results of an
unplanned well collision, a meaningful estimate of the probability of wellbore
intersections provides a valuable risk-management tool. A number of estimation
techniques are currently in use in the industry; however, all of these have
limitations that may not be clearly understood. For example, many computations
currently in use fail when the two wells are parallel; they ignore the fact
that the drilled well may have reached its current location without collision,
or they return an identical result regardless of whether the drilling well is
thought to be approaching or departing from the existing well.
A rational approach to the problem begins by clearly defining the
probability to be estimated. This paper presents a method to ascertain the
probability that a particular interval of the well being drilled might
intersect an existing adjacent wellbore. An overall collision probability can
then be obtained by combining the probabilities associated with successive
intervals along the reference well. The estimates of probability are based on
knowledge of the surveyed well paths and their survey uncertainties, expressed
in the form of position covariance matrices.
A body of relevant research exists in the field of astrodynamics concerned
with estimating the risk of collision between orbiting satellites. This paper
draws on previous work from both the oil field and aerospace in developing a
more rigorous assessment of collision probability, overcoming the limitation of
previous methods. Examples demonstrate that the new method agrees with analytic
results for both parallel and nonparallel well paths in simple cases where both
wells are straight in the region of interest.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
506 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
7 July 2008
- Meeting paper published:
21 September 2008
- Revised manuscript received:
31 December 2008
- Manuscript approved:
12 January 2009
- Published online:
14 January 2010
- Version of record:
14 June 2010