SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 26,
Number 2,
June 2011,
pp. 278-286
Summary
Quantitative models of safety incidence allow managers to connect risk
factors and elements of the safety management system (SMS) (e.g.,
risk-management practices, inspection protocols, processes for reporting unsafe
conditions) to outcomes. The results provide evidence that can be used to
allocate resources to those incident-prevention efforts with the largest
benefit/cost ratios. However, conventional methods of statistical and
regression analysis of safety incidents do not account for the fact that not
all incidents are reported. By relying on conventional methods, it is possible
that resources are being misallocated, and that the industry is missing
opportunities for improvement. This paper specifies nonconventional regression
models that explicitly account for imperfect reporting. The methods are applied
to an operator-provided data set of safety incidents. The analysis indicates
which variables contribute to changes in incidence, which contribute to
imperfect reporting, and which contribute to both. While all of the results of
the case study are not generalizable, they clearly demonstrate the incremental
value of a more complete model of safety incidence and reporting behavior.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
484 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
6 October 2010
- Meeting paper published:
21 September 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
4 February 2011
- Manuscript approved:
8 February 2011
- Published online:
31 May 2011
- Version of record:
13 June 2011