SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 26,
Number 4,
December 2011,
pp. 550-556
Summary
As the underbalanced-drilling (UBD) technique develops, the benefits for
eliminating formation damage and improving productivity have been well received
by Chinese national oil companies. Potential candidates for UBD reservoirs are
tight sandstone and volcanic rock, as well as other low-permeability hard
rocks. Not all candidates are ultimately suitable. Experience in China suggests
that inappropriate application of underbalanced reservoir drilling may have an
adverse effect on protecting reservoirs, which in turn increases drilling
risks. To achieve successful application of the technique, it is essential
first to fully evaluate the suitability of the reservoir for UBD. Furthermore,
it has been observed that there is a lack of research when it comes to
evaluation of reservoir suitability with respect to UBD opportunities in China.
Most current basin studies in China focus on geographic distributions and
reservoir lithology characterizations rather than geomechanical properties.
This paper addresses these gaps by presenting the result of a China UBD
basins study. We have applied our reservoir-screening process to reservoirs in
382 oil and gas fields and 17 onshore basins of China to determine whether or
not these reservoirs are practical for UBD. Candidacy is determined by
evaluating a number of formation-damage mechanisms and related operational
risks within the reservoir-screening process. The research then identifies
formation-damage mechanisms of the UBD reservoir candidates and also presents a
ranking from high-potential to low-potential reservoirs for the suitability of
UBD, and establishes the highest production potential by application of the UBD
technique.
Also, the objective of the research is to evaluate and rank the suitability
of reservoirs for exploitation by UBD compared with conventional drilling and
completion processes. Proper identification of UBD opportunities will minimize
drilling risks for Chinese national oil companies.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,444 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
16 December 2010
- Meeting paper published:
1 November 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
30 May 2011
- Manuscript approved:
6 June 2011
- Published online:
12 December 2011
- Version of record:
27 December 2011