SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 27, Number 2, June 2012, pp. 303-314

SPE-139668-PA

Use of a Mechanistic Model To Forecast Cement-Sheath Integrity

View full textPDF ( 2,681 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/139668-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/139668-PA

Citation

  • Bois, A.-P., Garnier, A., Galdiolo, G., and Laudet, J.-B. 2012. Use of a Mechanistic Model To Forecast Cement-Sheath Integrity. SPE Drill & Compl  27 (2): 303-314. SPE-139668-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/139668-PA.

Summary

Tests performed in the laboratory have shown that there exist two types of mechanisms that could lead to loss of cement-sheath integrity: mechanical degradation, when cement is submitted to compressive or tensile loadings that are too high compared with its strength, and chemical degradation. The worst case is when both mechanisms occur at the same time or one after the other. For example, a cement sheath that is damaged before entering into contact with a degrading fluid will allow this fluid to penetrate deeper into the cement sheath, hence accelerating cement chemical degradation.

As a consequence, it is of paramount importance to understand the mechanisms that could lead to loss of cement-sheath integrity before any chemical degradation occurs. It is with this objective that a mechanistic model was developed to simulate the various modes of loss of cement-sheath integrity after cement has been placed: (a) cement volume variations during hydration owing to chemical shrinkage/expansion; (b) cement volume-variations during hydration owing to cement heat-production; (c) contraction (dilation) of the casing owing to a decrease (an increase) in mud density/temperature; (d) cement volume decrease owing to pore collapse; and (e) thermal cycling.

This paper has two objectives: (1) present the mechanistic model and (2) on the basis thereof, show that loss of cement-sheath integrity depends not only on cement properties but also on the well architecture and well history.

View full textPDF ( 2,681 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 9 June 2011
  • Meeting paper published: 11 November 2010
  • Revised manuscript received: 6 February 2012
  • Manuscript approved: 17 February 2012
  • Published online: 30 May 2012
  • Version of record: 11 June 2012