SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 27, Number 2, June 2012, pp. 194-203

SPE-143101-PA

A Proposed Method for Planning the Best Initial Response to Kicks Taken During Managed-Pressure-Drilling Operations

View full textPDF ( 968 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/143101-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143101-PA

Citation

  • Smith, J.R. and Patel, B.M. 2012. A Proposed Method for Planning the Best Initial Response to Kicks Taken During Managed-Pressure-Drilling Operations. SPE Drill & Compl  27 (2): 194-203. SPE-143101-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143101-PA.

Summary

An industry-supported research project has investigated well-control methods for managed-pressure drilling (MPD) using the constant-bottomhole-pressure (CBHP) method. This paper proposes a method for planning the best initial response to be used when a kick occurs during CBHP MPD on the basis of conclusions from the research. That research (Davoudi et al. 2010) concluded that the three most widely applicable initial responses to kicks during MPD were increasing casing pressure until flow out equals flow in, shutting the well in, and using an adaptation of an MPD-pump shutdown schedule to detect and shut in a low-rate kick. Increasing pump rate until flow out equals flow in was concluded to have limited, but potentially still important, applications.

The proposed method uses a decision tree during the planning phase of a well to select the best kick response to be used for each hole interval for inclusion in the drilling program. This selection is based on the desired tolerance to kicks, equipment being used, well geometry, and conclusiveness of the kick warning signs. The equations necessary to calculate decision parameters, example calculations for an application of the decision tree, and comparison of simulation results to application of the decision tree are included. The decision tree indicates the response that maximizes kick tolerance within the well design, gives a basis for revising equipment or well design to maximize kick tolerance, and supports calculation of the expected kick-tolerance advantage of the increasing-casing-pressure response vs. a shut-in response.

View full textPDF ( 968 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 18 July 2011
  • Meeting paper published: 6 April 2011
  • Revised manuscript received: 6 March 2012
  • Manuscript approved: 15 March 2012
  • Published online: 29 May 2012
  • Version of record: 11 June 2012