SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 27,
Number 3,
September 2012,
pp. 348-354
Summary
Producing natural gas from shale-gas reservoirs presents a great challenge
to petroleum engineers owing to the low-permeability nature of this type of gas
reservoir. Large-scale and expensive hydraulic-fracturing operations are often
required for enhancing gas well productivity. Because of the shaly
characteristics of the reservoir rock, the hydraulically fractured gas wells
are vulnerable to damage by fracturing fluids. However, the true significance
of the formation damage in shale-gas reservoirs is still not clear. It is
highly desirable to have a simple method for predicting the degree of
fracture-face matrix damage and for optimizing fracturing treatments. This
paper is meant to fill this gap.
A new mathematical model was developed in this study to predict the effect
of fracture-face matrix damage on the productivity of fractured gas wells in
shale-gas reservoirs. A unique feature of the new model is that it considers
reservoir/fracture crossflow in finite-conductivity fractures. Results of the
model analyses were sensitized to reservoir properties and facture-face
matrix-skin properties determined by the fracturing-fluid properties and
treatment conditions. Large ranges of possible leakoff and spurt-loss
coefficients were investigated. We concluded that, in the ranges of reservoir
and fluid properties used in this study, well productivity should drop by less
than 15% even if the residual matrix permeability is reduced to only 5% of the
virgin reservoir permeability in the damage zone. Neglecting the resistance to
flow in the fracture will overestimate the effect of matrix damage on well
productivity. The well-productivity drop caused by matrix damage is most
sensitive to the invasion depth and damaged permeability.
© 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
2,205 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
7 September 2011
- Meeting paper published:
8 June 2011
- Revised manuscript received:
4 February 2012
- Manuscript approved:
28 March 2012
- Published online:
2 August 2012
- Version of record:
18 September 2012