SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 28,
Number 1,
March 2013,
pp. 93-104
Summary
American Petroleum Institute (API) design equations describing burst and
collapse limits of tubulars do not address pipe body response when axial stress
in the casing exceeds the material yield strength. However, casing yielding
commonly occurs in thermal operations in western Canada, where steam-assisted
gravity drainage (SAGD) and cyclic-steam-stimulation (CSS) operating
temperatures generally range from 200 to 350°C. Cemented production casing is
subject to both passive and active loading conditions during operation:
thermally induced strain-based cyclic axial loading occurs in conjunction with
net internal or external differential pressure. A sound engineering basis for
selecting tubular configurations that considers the combined loading state in
this situation and establishes an appropriate design margin does not currently
exist. This paper describes numerical analyses for combined post-yield loading
conditions and provides a starting point for burst and collapse design for
thermal casing. Burst analysis of axially constrained casing indicates that,
contrary to what might be inferred from elastic-strength calculations, an
initial thermally induced axial compressive strain does not substantially
reduce the burst (rupture) pressure. By contrast, even low net external
pressures can lead to ovalization and loss of wellbore access when combined
with thermally induced axial strain if the cement sheath does not offer
adequate radial support. Sensitivity studies demonstrate the strong influence
of pipe diameter-to-thickness ratio (D/t) and pressure ratios and pipe material
mechanical properties on ovalization response. Analysis results are compared
with API burst and collapse predictions, thermal operating experience at Shell
Canada's Peace River project, and available physical testing results for
similar loading conditions.
© 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,268 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
24 August 2012
- Meeting paper published:
6 March 2012
- Revised manuscript received:
12 November 2012
- Manuscript approved:
19 November 2012
- Version of record:
14 March 2013