SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 28,
Number 1,
March 2013,
pp. 75-85
Summary
The positional uncertainty about a point on a wellbore is commonly
represented as an ellipsoid. The ellipsoid also accounts for the dimensions of
the casing or open hole. With the use of this model, at any time the resulting
uncertainty about a wellbore along its trajectory is a curved, continuous cone.
To a good approximation, the intersection of the plane normal to a reference
well with these cones can be represented as ellipses. This simple geometrical
model has been adopted by standards organizations to define minimal acceptable
separation distances between wellbores (e.g., the Norwegian NORSOK D-10
Standard and Oil and Gas UK Well Integrity Guidelines). Because of mathematical
difficulties, the existing methods for calculating the resulting separation
factors are only approximations and may be either too optimistic or too
conservative, particularly for ellipses with high eccentricities. This paper
presents explicit equations for determining the exact condition in which the
ellipses touch, expressing the result as an expansion scale factor. Methods are
presented for the expansion of either ellipse or both, together with
implementation notes and other associated tools. The new algorithms are only
marginally less efficient than the existing approximation methods, and they can
be used to increase the allowable proximity of two adjacent wells while
satisfying the geometrical and probabilistic constraints. The examples included
in the paper illustrate this. The proposed calculation method is consistent
with existing industry wellbore uncertainty models. Because the determination
of the osculating condition is exact, the calculation is neither too optimistic
nor too conservative. This paper is a response to discussions held at the SPE
Wellbore Positioning Technical Section meeting on 3 November 2011.
© 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
873 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
16 June 2012
- Meeting paper published:
8 October 2012
- Revised manuscript received:
30 October 2012
- Manuscript approved:
19 November 2012
- Published online:
8 March 2013
- Version of record:
14 March 2013