Vacuum-insulated tubing (VIT) has been used successfully to mitigate the
potentially harmful effects of annular pressure buildup (APB). In a
recent deepwater installation, the subject well had lost alternate APB
mitigation capability through a series of events. VIT was then chosen as
the only viable technology.
A common design companion of VIT is gelled brine, chosen to decrease annular
natural convection driven by heat loss around the VIT connections. There are,
however, several drawbacks to the indiscriminate use of gelled brine:
Tight clearances around the tubing
hanger running tool, creating the potential for debris plugging and/or
tool-recovery issues from the subsea wellhead.
Limitations imposed by VIT collapse and
hydrostatic packer setting pressures.
Unknown temperature/viscosity response
and associated quality-control requirements for displacement through a subsea
A need to reduce operational time and
These issues led to the consideration of alternative means of controlling
natural convection, and an effort was made to understand, improve, and deploy
external coupling insulators.
An in-ground vertical experiment with two connected joints of VIT was
conducted with and without coupling insulators. Temperatures were
monitored at multiple locations. Test results confirm the effectiveness
of external coupling insulators. Several theoretical models using
different numerical techniques (finite difference, lumped mass/resistance,
finite element, and computational fluid dynamics) were found to be consistent
with experimental results. These were compared with critical APB
temperatures calculated with a commercial wellbore simulator. The net
result of these studies was to adopt the external insulators.
This paper reviews the experimental data and presents several models of a
vertically aligned VIT in a deepwater completion. A comparison of thermally
effective APB solutions is presented, together with a critical assessment of
modeling and experimental accuracy.
Thermal insulation technology is an evolving science covering a wide range
of industries and applications and suitable for energy conservation, transport
and storage of fluids, isolation of critical components, and other uses.
The first oilfield insulated tubing applications, based on silica powder and
polyurethane media, were designed to prevent flowline subsidence in the Alaskan
tundra. From these simple beginnings, vacuum tubing developed into a
highly efficient insulation system capable of carrying large axial loads while
fitting within a compact form factor.
The reduction of catastrophic risk associated with annular pressure buildup
in a subsea well completion requires specialized technology (Moe and Erpelding
2000). In the late 90s, following one notable and several suspected well
failures in the Gulf of Mexico (Bradford et al. 2002; Ellis et al. 2002; Gosch
et al. 2002; Vargo et al. 2002), interest in APB solutions increased. The
BP Marlin failure was attributed to several potential root causes, one of which
was APB. To alleviate APB, VIT was recognized as an effective remedy in
minimizing heat transfer to outer annuli.
In 2002, BP’s King West completion was challenged by several unanticipated
technical problems. Standard mitigation methods were considered, but
because of wellbore conditions, VIT was chosen as the only viable
VIT consists of an inner and outer tube welded together at both ends. Piping
sizes range from 2-in. line pipe to 7-in. pipe in Range 2 or 3. Materials are
generally L-80 or 13Cr. The annular space, typically 0.15 to 0.5 in.
wide, is evacuated and plug welded. This space contains aluminum foil wraps for
radiation reduction and a getter to scavenge hydrogen and other deleterious
gases for vacuum preservation over a typical design life of 10 years.
Historically, VIT has been applied successfully in a number of areas:
enhanced secondary oil recovery through the use of steam delivery systems
[steamflood, steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)], paraffin buildup
prevention, alleviation of hydrate formation, and an increase in heavy oil flow
through temperature preservation. While VIT has been effective in these
applications, the understanding necessary to design systems that are
problem-specific, and particularly the analytical tools required to optimize
those systems, have not yet been developed.
To understand VIT performance conceptually, one must begin with the vacuum
insulation jacket. Thermal insulation in the vacuum body is extremely
high. An alternate viewpoint is that the heat flux (heat flow per unit
area) through the vacuum space is relatively low (Fig. 1). The
complicating feature of VIT is the relatively large heat fluxes around the
coupler region (Azzola et al. 2004). There are two distinct heat paths,
each preferentially following low thermal resistivity through the relatively
high-conductivity steel. The first path runs radially through the coupler
(Fig. 1). The second path runs axially along the inner pipe toward the
weld, then through the weld and down the outer pipe. From there, heat is
lost by convection around a hot zone which extends generally one to two feet
axially beyond the weld (Fig. 1). The magnitude of this secondary heat
path depends on the convective heat transfer coefficient in the annulus, as
well as on other variables, but in general, it exceeds 30% of total heat
loss. For this reason, VIT acts like a fin, and as a consequence, it
exhibits a heat loss, which can be expressed as a thermal conductivity
(k) or overall heat transfer coefficient (U), which in turn
depend strongly on boundary conditions such as annular fluid properties,
coupling insulation, completion geometry, and ground conductivity (Azzola
et al. 2004).
© 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
- Original manuscript received:
12 October 2004
- Revised manuscript received:
18 September 2006
- Manuscript approved:
12 December 2006
- Version of record:
20 March 2007