Summary
Narrow pore-pressure/fracture gradient windows often necessitate additional
casing strings to maintain wellbore stability and reach deeper objective
depths. Operators are constrained by the number of strings of conventional
casing that can run through subsea or surface wellhead equipment. Planning
solid expandable tubulars into the well design allows the operator to run
additional casing strings to reach deeper objectives. Traditionally, there are
two approaches used in selecting expandable tubular technology: one selects a
solid expandable tubular for use as a contingency and installs it after
encountering problems, often deep in a distressed well; and the other installs
a large-bore expandable in the upper section of the well as part of the base
well design.
Using a solid expandable tubular system in the upper sections of the well
design preserves hole size from the onset and allows more casing strings to be
run without pushing casing points to the fracture-gradient limit. Preserving
hole size contributes to drilling efficiency, reduces equivalent circulation
density (ECD), and minimizes risk associated with small-hole size in deeper
sections of the wellbore.
Another application for solid expandable tubulars is in conjunction with
surface blowout preventer (BOP) stack technology. Typical surface stack systems
are drilled using a subsea stack BOP system coupled to a
133/8-in. or 16-in. high-pressure drilling riser. After
setting the riser, only one or two conventional casing strings can be run
through the riser, which limits chances of drilling to deeper geologic
objectives.
This paper looks at two case histories. The first case history compares two
deepwater offset wells in the Mississippi Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico
(GoM). One well used expandable casing as a contingency late in the well
execution phase, and the other well incorporated the expandable casing as part
of the base design in an upper-hole section. The second case history evaluates
a well in which solid expandable tubular technology allows up to three
additional casing strings to be run in a surface-stack application. This paper
discusses how combining solid expandable tubular technology with surface-stack
technology pushes the technical limits of surface-stack drilling into deeper
water and deeper formations.
Introduction
Adding value to any drilling design requires the deliberate, objective, and
thorough assessment of known factors, as well as a plan for risk management of
uncertainties. Methodical planning enables operators to design the “most likely
to succeed” approach that employs the most appropriate technology. But even the
best-laid plans can be disrupted by unanticipated conditions, resulting in a
deviation from the drilling program design that can jeopardize the ability of
the well to reach key objectives. Generating a well design to reach production
zones with viable economics requires a strategic approach that addresses known
factors as well as prepares for the unexpected, such as lost circulation,
differential sticking, and abnormally pressured zones that can cause abrupt
changes in wellbore conditions, resulting in a bust in the original well
design.
© 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
2,117 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
15 November 2004
- Revised manuscript received:
18 April 2006
- Manuscript approved:
6 June 2006
- Version of record:
20 December 2006