SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 20, Number 2, June 2005, pp. 101-108

SPE-97465-PA

Well-Control Analyses on Extended-Reach and Multilateral Trajectories

View full textPDF ( 479 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/97465-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97465-PA

Citation

  • Choe, J., Schubert, J.J., and Juvkam-Wold, H.C. 2005. Well-Control Analyses on Extended-Reach and Multilateral Trajectories. SPE Drill & Compl20 (2): 101-108. SPE-97465-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 1.4.5 Well Control, Blowout Control, Relief-Well Drilling
  • 1.2 Drilling Design and Analysis
  • 1.4.3 Downhole Operations (Casing, Cementing, Coring, Geosteering, Fishing)
  • 1.2.6 Well Control, Blowout Flow Modeling
  • 1.4.5 Well Control, Blowout Control, Relief-Well Drilling

Summary

For economic and technical reasons, the industry has used directional, extended-reach, horizontal, and multilateral wells. Although technologies are well developed for these wells, and there are numerous successes in the last decade, these wells still have high level of risk in drilling and completion. Well control is one of the relatively unanswered, but important, operations because improper well control followed by a blowout is one of the most expensive and feared operational hazards.

To maintain a specified bottomhole pressure (BHP), surface choke pressures highly depend on kick vertical height in the well and well trajectory. As the final hold angle of the well increases from vertical, shut-in casing pressure (SICP) reduces to shut-in drillpipe pressure (SIDPP) and remains the same as long as the kick stays in the horizontal section. For equal vertical depths, the maximum choke pressure is insensitive to hold angles or hold lengths, as long as the initial pit-volume gain is the same. However, for directional and extended-reach wells, choke pressure can increase, even without kick expansion, because of the gain of kick vertical height in the build section. This may mask choke-pressure reduction because of larger annular capacity when the kick passes the casing shoe, especially if the kickoff point (KOP) and casing-shoe depth are close.

In multilateral wells with more than one kicking wellbore, SIDPP is affected by both formation overpressure and kick size in each wellbore. The maximum value among them will appear at the surface. Therefore, we should be careful in the interpretation of the shut-in pressures. For safe kick circulation, we must consider additional pressure to compensate for hydrostatic-pressure reduction resulting from kick migration and expansion in branch wellbores.

Introduction

For economic and technical reasons, the industry has used directional, extended-reach, and horizontal wells. Directional drilling is used to direct a wellbore along a preplanned path to a target located at a given distance from the vertical. We can calculate its trajectory accurately if directional data such as measured depth, inclination angle, and azimuth are known.1 For the planning of the well trajectory in a two-dimensional plane, we can use generalized equations,2,3 which are applicable for directional and horizontal wells, rather than using composite buildup charts or several directional equations, depending on each trajectory type. 

Several wells drilled from one platform for offshore development will reduce the development cost significantly and make the installation of production equipment efficient. These wells are also applicable for areas that will not permit vertical wells because of inaccessible obstructions, limited spaces, or environmental concerns. Multiple targets can be reached by a single directional trajectory.

From the production point of view, horizontal or near-horizontal wells are used to enhance recovery efficiency by increasing reservoir exposure or by intersecting fractured reservoirs. It can also reduce chances of water coning, especially for a thin reservoir. They have been used extensively in heavy-oil reservoirs. In the early 1990s, the industry employed multilateral wells from which multiple wellbores are drilled from one main wellbore (also called the “parent” wellbore). Multilateral wells have the same aforementioned advantages. However, implementation will be much more complex than that of directional wells with a single wellbore.

Although technologies are well developed for these wells, and there are numerous successes in the last decade,4,5 these wells still have a high level of risk concerning drilling, completion, pressure imbalance, communication among laterals, and production management. It will require multidisplinary teamwork, thorough planning, and implementation as planned. Because well control is one of the relatively unanswered but important operations, we must develop a firm well-control plan for practical applications of these wells.

A kick is defined as an unscheduled flow of formation fluids into a wellbore. Well control includes several activities for kick prevention, kick detection, kick confinement, and kick removal with safe and efficient procedures. The best way of controlling kicks is kick prevention, which may be achieved through sound and thorough planning and execution.

View full textPDF ( 479 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 11 August 2004
  • Revised manuscript received: 30 March 2005
  • Manuscript approved: 20 April 2005
  • Version of record: 15 June 2005