SPE Drilling & Completion
Volume 20, Number 3, September 2005, pp. 209-217

SPE-99345-PA

Cost-Effective Sand-Control Operations Play Key Role in Revitalizing Mature Gas Field

View full textPDF ( 1,465 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/99345-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99345-PA

Citation

  • Ripa, G., Ligrone, A., Zamparini, A., Sportelli, M., Mathis, S.P., and Conte, A. 2005. Cost-Effective Sand-Control Operations Play Key Role in Revitalizing Mature Gas Field. SPE Drill & Compl20 (3): 209-217. SPE-99345-PA.

Summary

When revitalizing mature oil or gas fields, the ability to maximize productivity while minimizing operating costs is critical. Achieving these goals becomes more challenging where sand control is required. This is especially true in connection with a complex reservoir lithology, which leads to a variety of fracture and pore pressure gradients and premature water breakthrough. In addition, reduced deliverability resulting from pressure depletion presents additional complications related to achieving acceptable project economics.

The Barbara field, located in the central Adriatic Sea, is an example of this type of reservoir. For this project, a dedicated work team was assigned to identify and implement the solutions to improve field performance through continuous operations optimization. The Barbara field consists of stacked pay sections that have been depleted since the early 1980s. To achieve favorable economics, techniques had to be used that would do both: maximize the deliverability of each well and minimize operational costs.

This paper reviews the Barbara field workover program. The evolution of techniques, equipment, and products leading to enhanced productivity while substantially reducing costs is described. The fluid systems and operation procedures designed to optimize frac-pack geometry are discussed. In addition, the one-trip multizone gravel-pack assemblies are described that allow multiple zones to be individually fracture packed in a single run, thus providing significant rig-time reductions without sacrificing completion efficiency. Finally, the complex nature of this reservoir dictates the need for a variety of completion techniques. This means that fracture packing was not necessarily an option for all zones. For the intervals at which fracturing was not employed, productivity still needed to be maximized. To accomplish this goal, perforation tunnel-cleanup procedures have been optimized.

Introduction

The Barbara field (Fig. 1) is situated in the Adriatic offshore area, approximately 30 km from the coast. It has the form of a very gentle, slightly asymmetrical anticline, having its eastern limb steeper than its western. It occupies an area of about 80 km2 and a vertical closure of about 50 m. Methane-gas-bearing strata are found at 40 different productive layers and have been identified at depths between 1000 and 1300 meters; the permeability ranges from a minimum of 5 to 10 md to a maximum of 500 to 600 md. The reservoir sands are composed of sediments of the Asti formation, which were deposited in the Pleistocene period in a turbidite environment; the cap rock is formed by several argillaceous intercalations. Multizone completions are necessary for efficient reservoir management.  Experience and low unconfined compressive strength ranging from 200 to 320 psi (determined with a confined stress of 60 psi owing to the unconsolidated nature of the gas-bearing productive layers) indicate that these unconsolidated sands require sand control.

The exploitation of the Barbara field started in the early 1980s. In less than 7 years, the field was completed with over 100 wells in dual, multiselective, sand-control completions. In the late 1990s, however, because of the subsidence phenomena, most of the higher-producing layers saw a dramatic drop in production performance. 

To aid in restoring productivity, a major workover program was conducted between the years 2000 and 2003 on the platforms “F” and “C” of the Barbara field. The original project scope was only 11 wells; however, the unexpectedly positive results led to this project being expanded to a total of 77 completions in 16 wells.

View full textPDF ( 1,465 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 4 February 2004
  • Revised manuscript received: 7 June 2005
  • Manuscript approved: 18 June 2005
  • Version of record: 15 September 2005