SPE Economics & Management
Volume 1, Number 1, October 2009, pp. 11-18

SPE-123384-PA

Reserves in Nontraditional Reservoirs: How Can We Account for Them?

View full textPDF ( 428 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/123384-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/123384-PA

Citation

  • Lee., W.J.  2009. Reserves in Nontraditional Reservoirs: How Can We Account for Them? SPE Econ & Mgmt.  1 (1): 11-18. SPE-123384-PA. doi:10.2118/123384-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 3.1.1 Reserves Replacement and Booking
  • 3.7.2 Unconventional Resources

Keywords

  • reserves accounting, unconventional reservoirs

Summary

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), on 29 December 2008, adopted new rules for disclosing oil and gas reserves. The definitions contained within these rules are broadly consistent with the SPE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS); the definitions in the previous rules differed from PRMS in a number of specific instances (SPE 2007). A notable difference in the new rules is inclusion of more nontraditional resources as potential oil and gas reserves rather than as mining reserves. With new disclosure rules, new questions arise about the manner in which reserves in nontraditional resources are to be reported.

Introduction

On 29 December 2008, the United States SEC adopted modernized rules for reporting oil and gas reserves in filings with the Commission. The Commission posted the full text of these rules and commentary on its web site (SEC 2008b). The new rules will be in effect for documents filed with the SEC for fiscal years ending on or after 31 December, 2009.

These new rules are the culmination of an effort by the SEC to review the oil and gas reporting requirements announced publicly in May 2007, when the Commission published a notice that it intended to appoint an "Academic Engineering Fellow" to examine reserves reporting requirements, an appointment for which I was chosen. Following an effort that began with my arrival at the SEC in October 2007, the Commission issued a "Concept Release" in December 2007 (SEC 2007) in which it asked for public comments on the need for revisions of the oil and gas reporting requirements and suggestions for what revisions, if any, should include. Eighty comments from the public were received through February 2008. The Commission staff studied these comments, and, in June 2008, issued proposed rules that would modernize oil and gas reserves definitions and reporting requirements (SEC 2008a). Sixty-eight comments from the public were received through September 2008, and analysis of these comments led to the final rules adopted in December 2008.

Major features of the new rules adopted include the following:

  • Annual average prices, calculated using prices on the first day of each month during the filer's fiscal year, will replace fiscal year-end prices in reserves estimation procedures (such as determination of the economic limit for a property).
  • Recovery of non-traditional resources will be considered to be oil and gas activities, and these resources will potentially be classified as oil and gas reserves instead of mining reserves. Nontraditional resources include bitumen, oil shales, some coal, gas hydrates, and other non-renewable natural resources from which synthetic oil or gas can be extracted.
  • Filers can disclose probable and possible reserves on an optional basis.
  • Unspecified technologies, including proprietary techniques, that have demonstrated reasonable certainty in applications will replace rigidly specified tests as the basis for establishing "reasonable certainty" in estimating proved reserves.
  • A "reasonable certainty" criterion for estimating proved undeveloped reserves will replace the "certainty" criterion, thus aligning the criterion for proved undeveloped reserves with that for proved developed reserves.
  • The "one offset" limit rule for proved undeveloped reserves will be removed and replaced with a reasonable certainty criterion.
  • The definitions are largely consistent with the SPE PRMS (Petroleum Resources Management System. 2009) definitions.

View full textPDF ( 428 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 26 2009
  • Meeting paper published: 24 2009
  • Revised manuscript received: 7 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 30 2009
  • Published online: 28 October 2009
  • Version of record: 28 October 2009