SPE Economics & Management
Volume 1, Number 1, October 2009, pp. 27-34

SPE-124723-PA

Corporate Venture Capital as a Conduit for Early Adoption of Emerging Technology: A Decade of Experience

View full textPDF ( 411 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/124723-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124723-PA

Citation

  • Unneland, T. and Hanten, J.  2009. Corporate Venture Capital as a Conduit for Early Adoption of Emerging Technology: A Decade of Experience. SPE Econ & Mgmt.  1 (1): 27-34. SPE-124723-PA. doi: 10.2118/124723-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 3.6 Research and Development Programs
  • 3.6.1 Technology Deployment
  • 3.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making
  • 3.3 Strategic Planning and Management

Keywords

  • Venture capital, Emerging technology, Investment, Technology transfer, Innovation

Summary

A continuous challenge in the petroleum industry is to identify and rapidly implement new technologies into field operations to increase production, improve employee productivity, and lower costs. Utilizing new world-class technology is critical as the industry moves towards more complex environments. To support this trend, a Chevron corporate strategy is to leverage technology to deliver superior performance and growth. A range of suitable tools are available, such as internal R&D, joint ventures, and collaboration with academia and service companies. A less traditional method in the petroleum industry is to use corporate venture capital (VC) as a tool to gain access to world-class technology. This paper covers a decade of Chevron VC experience, including justification for corporate VC investments, how success is measured, financial and strategic yield, investment criteria, governance, partnerships, track record, and portfolio highlights. In this paper, several technology transfer success stories are given including the financial and operational value they created for the Chevron business units. The investments cover such diverse technology areas as artificial lift, seismic monitoring, deepwater technology, wind power, and high-end computing for reservoir simulation.

Introduction

The Venture Capital program was conceptualized in Chevron in late 1998 during the run-up of the technology sector and new business models associated with the Internet and the "New Economy." The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) proposed the venture program as a method to leverage technology investments and access technology innovations that were being developed in venture-backed companies. Chevron?s headquarters are located in San Ramon, California, and the proximity to the Silicon Valley VC community as well as the strategic intent to rapidly adopt new technology were strong factors contributing to the concept. In addition, prudent investing held the promise of producing financial returns along with technology access and strategic impact.

A study team within Chevron was commissioned to review various corporate VC models, and develop the proposal and governance structures that created Chevron Technology Ventures Investments LLC (CTVI). The study team recommended creating a small new unit for the purpose of making VC investments to access technology, which would report directly to the CTO. The guidance was to operate the unit like a VC firm, including managing the portfolio of investments as a series of closed-end funds, each approved individually, and monitored through the life of the fund. As for governance, it was recommended to utilize an Investment Committee (IC) to ensure accountability and facilitate rapid decisions for investments. The IC was, and continues to be, composed of the CTO and senior members of the finance and business development function to validate the technical soundness, the connection to Chevron strategies, and finally the financial analysis of any proposed investment. The recommended structure for Fund I was a 10-year closed-end fund comprising both direct and VC Fund investments. Chevron subsequently approved and publicly announced a $60 MM USD fund.

View full textPDF ( 411 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 7 2009
  • Meeting paper published: 4 October 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 3 2009
  • Published online: 28 October 2009
  • Version of record: 28 October 2009