Summary
This paper describes and reports the results of analyses of the costs of
carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage in southwest Western Australia. We
analyze the costs of capturing approximately 22 million tonnes per year of CO2
and injecting it into one of three storage sites: the Gage sandstone offshore
Perth, the Dongara depleted gas field, and the Neocomian subcrop offshore
Geraldton.
The central estimates obtained are that the real cost to capture, transport,
and inject CO2 for a period of 25 years is between 59 and 63 Australian dollars
(AUD) per tonne of CO2 avoided (in 2005 terms), depending on the location of
the injection site.
The sensitivity of these cost estimates to changes in key assumptions is
also analyzed. These sensitivity analyses show that the costs of carbon capture
and storage (CCS) can vary significantly with different assumptions for key
variables.
Introduction
The area in and surrounding Perth in Western Australia emits more than 25
million tonnes (Mt) of CO2 from stationary sources every year. Most of these
emissions come from large industrial complexes, including power stations, metal
manufacturing facilities, and petrochemical plants.
CCS involves separating CO2 from a mixed-gas source into a concentrated
stream, compressing it to a supercritical state, and then transporting it to an
injection site, where it will be injected into suitable formations in the
subsurface.
This report investigates the cost of capturing CO2 from existing industrial
facilities in the Perth region, followed by transportation and offshore storage
in one of three sites in southwest Western Australia (one such case is shown in
Fig. 1). The objective of this study is to examine the opportunities for CCS
within this region. The work was conducted in cooperation with Geoscience
Australia and forms part of a larger study on opportunities for CCS in the
region. The costs are estimated in real Australian dollars in year 2005 terms
and are reported before tax.
The purpose of these preliminary analyses is to estimate the indicative
costs of CCS for the area. To do this, the design of a CCS system must be
considered in very broad terms. A detailed design for such a system is beyond
the scope of the paper.
Assumptions and Methodology
The results are estimated by use of software developed in-house at the
University of New South Wales for the CO2CRC. The model performs simple mass-
and energy-balance calculations to estimate process-equipment sizes, the number
of wells, the size of platforms, and other system parameters. Equipment costs
are estimated by use of algorithms developed from rules of thumb, literature
data, and vendor quotes. The general methodology has been described elsewhere
(Allinson et al. 2003, 2006), and the site-specific assumptions for this study
are detailed below.
Economics. Costs of CCS are estimated in AUD per tonne of CO2
avoided. The mass of CO2 avoided is the difference between the amount of CO2
that is emitted without CCS and the amount emitted with CCS. For example, if a
power station emits 10 million tonnes of CO2 per year without CCS and only 2
million tonnes of CO2 with CCS, then the mass of CO2 avoided is 8 million
tonnes per year (Mt/a). It is assumed in these estimates that the reference
plant is the same power station that hosts the CCS process.
Costs are estimated using a real discount rate of 7%, with a construction
period of 2 years and a project life of 25 years. The capital costs are phased,
40% in the first year and 60% in the second year. The process is assumed to
operate 7,446 hours per year out of the possible total of 8,760 hours,
representing a load factor of 85%.
It is further assumed that the energy used in the CCS process is purchased from
a newly built external power source that also incorporates CCS. The power
source is assumed to be a 1,500-MW natural-gas combined cycle with capture and
storage. The cost of electricity purchased from this source is AUD 55/MW-h, and
the power source emits CO2 at a rate of 0.05 million tonnes for every
megawatt-hour of power generated.
© 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,233 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
5 February 2007
- Revised manuscript received:
12 April 2007
- Manuscript approved:
17 April 2007
- Version of record:
20 September 2007