SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
Volume 4,
Number 3,
September 2009,
pp. 80-86
Summary
This work provides a means to predict when and where hydrate plugs will form
in oil-dominated flowlines. The method was funded by the DeepStar Consortium of
Energy Companies and is based on a Colorado School of Mines hydrate kinetic
(CSMHyK) model developed over the last six years, which is currently an
addition to the transient multiphase program OLGA by SPT Group Inc. The
predictions show good agreement to data for hydrate formation in three flow
loops with five oils.
Recent CSMHyK-OLGA workshops have been held in Houston (March and April
2007) and Oslo (May 2007), and major companies are beginning to use the program
in flow assurance to predict where and when hydrate plugs will form in
flowlines.
Introduction
Gas and oil subsea production and transportation are moving to deeper
developments where the temperature and pressure conditions are well within the
hydrate stability region. The subsequent increased risk of hydrate formation
requires new strategies in flow assurance. Traditional methods of thermodynamic
avoidance are impractical or uneconomic because of the large amounts of
thermodynamic inhibitor (e.g., methanol or monoethylene glycol) required to
prevent hydrates from forming under these conditions (Sloan and Koh 2008; Sloan
2000). Transient operations are particularly problematic because of the
temporary extreme subcoolings under these conditions. The prediction of hydrate
formation rates in these conditions is a major challenge requiring knowledge of
the kinetics of hydrate formation, rather than only hydrate thermodynamics. The
ability to predict the rate of hydrate formation in subsea flowlines under
restart and shutdown conditions is extremely valuable in establishing new
operating procedures during transient operations and in flowline design.
© 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,003 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
31 January 2001
- Meeting paper published:
5 May 2008
- Revised manuscript received:
26 January 2009
- Manuscript approved:
3 February 2009
- Published online:
17 September 2009
- Version of record:
21 September 2009