SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
Volume 4, Number 4, December 2009, pp. 106-123

SPE-129572-PA

Spectral and Cycle-Counting Fatigue Damage Estimation Methods for Steel Catenary Risers

View full textPDF ( 1,485 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/129572-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129572-PA

Citation

  • Power, T.L., Maniar, D.R., Garrett, D.L., Phifer, E.H., and Vogiztzis, J.P. 2009. Spectral and Cycle-Counting Fatigue Damage Estimation Methods for Steel Catenary Risers. SPE Proj Fac & Const4 (4): 106-123. SPE-129572-PA. doi: 10.2118/129572-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 4.5 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers

Summary

Estimating fatigue damage under wind-driven sea loading is of primary importance in the design of steel catenary risers (SCRs) serving floating hosts. For design, the wind-driven sea is modeled as a stationary random process. The resulting dynamic stress in the SCR is also a stationary random process. Spectral methods provide closed-form fatigue damage estimates in terms of statistics for stationary random stress processes. Cycle-counting methods, such as rainflow cycle counting, provide an alternative damage estimation approach that is generally applicable and requires simulation of stress time series. The cycle-counting approach requires more computation than spectral methods. Damage estimates using the cycle-counting method may be lower than spectral damage estimates; however, a substantial amount of simulation may be required to quantify the difference.

This paper considers fatigue damage in SCRs attached to both tension-leg platform and semisubmersible hosts. Spectral and cycle-counting estimates are generated and compared. Accuracy of the estimates is discussed, and guidelines for damage estimation are presented. It is demonstrated that the differences between spectral and cycle-counting estimates of lifetime fatigue damage arise primarily from assumptions made regarding the spectral shape of the stress processes of interest.

View full textPDF ( 1,485 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 18 February 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 5 May 2008
  • Revised manuscript received: 23 March 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 28 March 2009
  • Published online: 14 January 2010
  • Version of record: 14 January 2010