SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
Volume 6,
Number 2,
June 2011,
pp. 65-70
Summary
Conventionally, carbon dioxide (CO2) removal requires the use of
a water-based amine solution and large absorber and regeneration towers. The
capital and ongoing operational costs for this process are substantial, and the
use (regeneration and disposal) of the amine solution can be problematic from
the perspectives of both safety and the environment. Nitrogen (N2)
can also be a problematic impurity in natural gas. Many researchers have been
investigating the use of alternative gas-separation technologies (such as
membranes and adsorption) targeted at removing N2 or CO2
from natural gas more efficiently. In this work, a simple-to-use predictive
tool that is easier than existing approaches, is less complicated, and requires
shorter computational times is applied to accurately predict the CO2
and N2-adsorption isotherms at low temperatures and pressures up to
saturation for a commercial carbon molecular sieve as a function of temperature
and partial pressure of these components. Accurate prediction of such data is
useful in evaluating the feasibility of using pressure-swing adsorption to
separate N2 and CO2 from natural gases at cryogenic
temperatures. The proposed method showed consistently accurate results across
the investigated wide pressure and temperature ranges, with an average absolute
deviation of less than 1% for both N2 and CO2 compared to
the existing Toth equation, which shows deviations of 3.5 and 1% for
N2 and CO2, respectively. This simple-to-use approach can
be of immense practical value for engineers and scientists to have a quick
check on adsorption capacities of a given adsorbent at various temperatures and
pressures without the necessity of any experimental measurements. In
particular, natural-gas-process engineers would find the proposed approach to
be user friendly, involving transparent calculations with no complex
expressions.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
363 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
28 April 2010
- Meeting paper published:
19 October 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
6 July 2010
- Manuscript approved:
15 July 2010
- Published online:
5 May 2011
- Version of record:
1 June 2011