SPE Production & Operations
Volume 24, Number 1, February 2009, pp. 35-42

SPE-103829-PA

New Trend in Oilfield Flow-Assurance Management: A Review of Thermal Insulating Fluids

View full textPDF ( 837 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/103829-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103829-PA

Citation

  • Wang, X., Qu, Q., Joavora, P., and Pearcy, R. 2009. New Trend in Oilfield Flow-Assurance Management: A Review of Thermal Insulating Fluids. SPE Prod & Oper  24 (1): 35-42. SPE-103829-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 4.8.3 Flow Assurance in Subsea Systems
  • 1.2 Drilling Design and Analysis
  • 4.5.4 Risers
  • 5.5.1 Asphaltenes, Hydrates, Precipitates, Scale, Waxes (Inhibition and Remediation)
  • 5.1 Design and Optimization

Summary

Flow assurance has been one of the major considerations in deepwater completion design, in which undesired heat loss from production tubing contributes to the formation of gas hydrates and causes the deposition of paraffin and asphaltene materials. Traditionally, controlling annular heat loss has been achieved with the injection of steam, the application of silicate foam, the pressurization of the annulus with inert gas, the use of gelled oil as an insulating packer fluid, and the use of vacuum insulated tubing (VIT). Each of these applications, however, has drawbacks because of either its working mechanism or the higher cost associated with the technology.

To secure the insulation of the wellbore and to reduce heat transfer from the production tubing to the surrounding areas, various aqueous insulating fluid systems with superior thermal properties have been developed in recent years. Field applications of these fluids have demonstrated significant reduction in heat loss by reducing conduction and minimizing convection. These thermal insulating fluids have been implemented with great success in more than 75 deepwater riser and packer applications in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) over the last several years. Case histories have demonstrated that installation of these water-based insulating fluids is an effective alternative to conventional insulation options and is becoming the preferred insulation method in many deepwater projects.

This paper will highlight the evolution of different insulating fluid systems and the field experience with each system. Proper testing methods relevant to oilfield flow assurance will be discussed and testing results for these fluids will be detailed. Field cases in the GOM will be summarized, and the effectiveness of these fluid systems will be demonstrated.

Introduction

Deepwater-oil and -gas exploration and development in the GOM has been a great success since the oil industry took the first step in the middle of 1990s. By the end of 2004, production from the deepwater fields in the GOM grew to an estimated 3.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day and 953,000 barrels of oil per day, which accounted for approximately 65% of the GOM oil production in 2004. The trend of exploration and development within the deepwater GOM shows no sign of diminishment, as evidenced by the 118 deepwater projects on production as of 2006 (U.S. Department of the Interior 2006). It has been forecast that the deepwater fields in the GOM would be producing nearly 2.0 million B/D in 2008.

As more multiphase hydrocarbons are produced from deepwater fields and transported for long distances, flow assurance becomes a more critical factor in the design stages of any oil- and gas-production system.

Flow assurance covers all issues related to the maintenance of the flow of oil and gas from reservoir to reception facilities. Being a multidiscipline activity, it involves the assessment of multiphase production systems and management of possible flow stoppages caused by the formation and deposition of solids. Prediction or modeling, prevention, and redemption of the formation of gas hydrate, paraffin, asphaltene, and scale buildup within the production tubing and flowlines are essential requirements.

The temperature in deepwater is usually near 40°F, or 4.4°C, which can cause flow problems in riser and export pipeline through undesired heat loss from production tubing by forming and depositing gas hydrate, paraffin, and asphaltene materials. Therefore, effective control of annular heat loss is critical to keep pipelines free of solid accumulations.

View full textPDF ( 837 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 30 August 2006
  • Meeting paper published: 5 December 2006
  • Revised manuscript received: 23 April 2008
  • Manuscript approved: 5 May 2008
  • Published online: 2 March 2009
  • Version of record: 26 February 2009