SPE Production & Operations
Volume 24, Number 2, May 2009, pp. 257-268

SPE-109561-PA

Multiphase Non-Darcy Flow in Proppant Packs

View full textPDF ( 1,908 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/109561-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/109561-PA

Citation

  • Barree, R.D. and Conway, M.W. 2009. Multiphase Non-Darcy Flow in Proppant Packs. SPE Prod & Oper  24 (2): 257-268. SPE-109561-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.3.3 Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel Packing
  • 6.3.1 Flow in Porous Media
  • 6.3.2 Multi-phase Flow

Keywords

  • multiphase non-Darcy flow, proppant packs

Summary

This paper builds on a model for single-phase, non-Darcy flow in porous media presented in by Barree and Conway (2004). In this work, the generalized equation for single-phase non-Darcy flow is extended to multiphase-flow conditions. Laboratory measurements of gas/water flow were conducted in several flow cells to determine relative permeability curves and the nonlinear relationship between individual-phase flow rate and induced potential gradient over a wide range of input fractional-flow conditions and over a range of Reynolds numbers (Re). A model is presented to predict multiphase non-Darcy flow in porous media that is applicable to high-deliverability reservoirs and hydraulically fractured wells.

Introduction

The importance of multiphase non-Darcy flow on well productivity and impairment has been recognized widely (Martins et al. 1990; Blom and Hagoort 1998; Vincent et al. 1999; Wang and Mohanty 1999; Barree et al. 2003; Lolon et al. 2004; Miskimins et al. 2005; Mohan et al. 2006). The combination of high-velocity and multiphase flow has great effects on productivity and stimulation effectiveness in hydraulically fractured wells. It is also important in near-well pressure drop in high-permeability retrograde-condensate reservoirs and fracture-pack or gravel-pack completions.

Many papers have addressed methods to predict the combined effects of non-Darcy and multiphase flow (Evans et al. 1987; Penny and Jin 1995; Jin and Penny 1998; Jin and Penny 2000; Olsen et al. 2004; Civan and Evans 1991; Civan and Evans 1993; Milton-Tayler 1993). Several of these are based on work conducted previously at Stim-Lab (Core Laboratories, Houston, USA) (Penny and Jin 1995; Jin and Penny 1998, 2000). All these previous works have assumed a constant value of the Forchheimer inertial coefficient (β), have relied on a combined average Reynolds number to define the non-Darcy-flow state, or both. In most cases, the combined effects of inertial losses and multiphase flow have been expressed by use of a modified value of β. These earlier methods neglect the fact that each phase flows at a different velocity in separate pore channels and each experiences a different phase Reynolds number. Further, phase velocity varies with saturation of each phase and relative permeability to each phase.

The current work presents an alternative method of predicting the non-Darcy multiphase relationship between potential gradient and phase-flow rate. The model is based on extensive laboratory measurements of many proppants at elevated confining stress, pore pressure, and temperature. The results can be applied to flow in proppant packs for hydraulically fractured wells and to high-velocity flow in reservoir rocks, typically in the near-wellbore region.

View full textPDF ( 1,908 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 27 July 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 11 November 2007
  • Revised manuscript received: 14 October 2008
  • Manuscript approved: 13 November 2008
  • Published online: 1 May 2009
  • Version of record: 1 May 2009