SPE Production & Operations
Volume 25, Number 1, February 2010, pp. 25-30

SPE-117176-PA

Successful Field Application of Novel, Nonsilicone Antifoam Chemistries for High-Foaming Heavy-Oil Storage Tanks in Northern Alberta

View full textPDF ( 346 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/117176-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/117176-PA

Citation

  • Wylde, J.J. 2010. Successful Field Application of Novel, Nonsilicone Antifoam Chemistries for High-Foaming Heavy-Oil Storage Tanks in Northern Alberta. SPE Prod & Oper  25 (1): 25-30. SPE-117176-PA. doi: 10.2118/117176-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.5.3 Chemical Treatments
  • 5.1.4 Monitoring and Control
  • 2.5.3 Produced Water Use, Discharge and Disposal

Summary

Substantial foam formation was being experienced by two operators in several heavy-oil leases in northern Alberta. This 10 to 12°API crude had a large foaming potential and a unique foam-formation mechanism. Crude oil passed from the wellhead through a short flowline to a pair of hydrostatically balanced and heated storage tanks. The storage tanks heated the crude oil from approximately 50°C to 85°C. In doing so, it caused gas breakout and degassing, which resulted in the formation of a thick, persistent foam in the top of the tanks. The foam would enter the transportation trucks and end up at the local battery and create carry-over and separation problems in the process systems.

Silicone antifoam products were not acceptable because of their poor environmental profile and the influence these large molecules had at the refinery where the crude oil was shipped for (predominantly) asphalt manufacture.

A wide range of chemistries was tested including phosphate-based products, ethoxylated and propoxylated esters, polyethylene glycol esters and oleates, alcohols, fatty alcohols, and ethoxylated and propoxylated alcohols. One of the major challenges detailed in this paper is that all products had to be freeze protected to −40°C. This was significant because many antifreeze chemicals affect the efficacy of antifoam chemicals.

This paper details evolution of testing leading to the field application of this combined defoamer/antifoam chemistry. Initial laboratory screening is included, which describes a laboratory test method designed to mimic the foam-formation environment in the field more accurately. The paper also illustrates the field-trial evaluation, as well as the case histories of full field implementation of the highest-efficacy products.

View full textPDF ( 346 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 13 July 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 20 October 2008
  • Revised manuscript received: 9 January 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 23 January 2009
  • Published online: 8 October 2009
  • Version of record: 1 March 2010