SPE Production & Operations
Volume 25,
Number 4,
November 2010,
pp. 453-460
Summary
A new model is developed that calculates the productivity of a hydraulically
fractured well, including the effect of fracture-face damage caused by fluid
leakoff. Results of the new model are compared with three previous models
(McGuire and Sikora 1960; Prats 1961; Binder and Raymond 1967). The existing
models assume either elliptical or radial flow around the well, with
permeability varying azimuthally. Significant differences in the calculated
well productivity indicate that earlier assumptions made regarding the flow
geometry can lead to significant overestimates of well productivity index (PI).
Agreement with the analytical solution of Prats (1961) is achieved for
finite-conductivity fractures and no fracture damage. It is shown that the use
of either McGuire's model (McGuire and Sikora 1960) or Raymond's model (Binder
and Raymond 1967) to estimate improvement in well PI in fractured wells can
lead to a significant overestimation of the well PI. The new model provides a
useful tool to quickly calculate the productivity of wells that have both a
finite-conductivity fracture and damage in the invaded zone. The simple and
discrete nature of the model makes it ideal for implementation in spreadsheets
and to connect to fracture-performance models.
Cleanup of the damage in the invaded zone depends on the capillary
properties of the formation and the drawdown pressure applied across the
damaged zone during production. If capillary forces are small and drawdown
pressure is high, the water will be recovered, resulting in negligible damage.
It is found that the invaded zone will cause significant damage when the
permeability of the damaged zone is reduced by more than 90%. For
low-permeability, depleted formations where water recovery is poor, the
fracturing fluid should be energized with a gas component so that the relative
permeability damage to gas inflow can be minimized.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
558 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
11 November 2008
- Meeting paper published:
20 January 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
22 May 2010
- Manuscript approved:
25 June 2010
- Published online:
24 September 2010
- Version of record:
17 November 2010