SPE Production & Operations
Volume 25,
Number 3,
August 2010,
pp. 367-375
Summary
Diversion techniques must be employed to remove all the damage from the
entire producing interval. Diversion in carbonates is more difficult than in
sandstones because of the ability of acid to significantly increase the
permeability in carbonates as the acid dissolves carbonate rocks. The apparent
viscosity of the in-situ gelled acid based on polymer plays a key role in
diversion because it creates a viscosity differential in treated and untreated
zones. An extensive literature survey and field data show that there is no
agreement on the effectiveness of this acid system. Therefore, this study was
conducted to better understand this acid system and determine factors that
impact its viscosity buildup. Three commercially available in-situ acids were
examined.
The effect of salts and iron (III) [Fe(III)] contamination on the apparent
viscosity of these acids was examined in detail. Several new findings were
identified, including that polymer and other additives were separated out of
the acid when these acids were prepared in high-salinity brines. Preparing the
in-situ gelled acid with saline waters decreased the viscosity of the acid in
live and partially neutralized conditions. Concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl)
solutions produced high concentrations of calcium ion that reduced the
viscosity of the in-situ-gelled acid system. Therefore, in-situ-gelled acids
that are based on polymers should be used at low HCl concentrations (3 to 5 wt%
HCl). Sodium (NaCl), calcium (CaCl2), or ferric chloride
(FeCl3) reduced the apparent viscosity of live gelled acids. A brown
precipitate was noted during the neutralization of acid systems that contained
Fe (III), even in the presence of the recommended concentration of iron-control
agents. Therefore, in-situ-gelled acids that are based on polymers should be
prepared using low salinity waters and used at low HCl concentrations (3 to 5
wt% HCl).
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
481 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
28 February 2009
- Meeting paper published:
21 April 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
23 December 2009
- Manuscript approved:
25 February 2010
- Published online:
8 July 2010
- Version of record:
11 August 2010