SPE Production & Operations
Volume 25,
Number 4,
November 2010,
pp. 416-422
Summary
Available footprint on offshore platforms (Fig. 1) can be a significant
challenge for coiled-tubing (CT) operations. Many times, platform limitations
require that a smaller CT unit be deployed for work that would be faster and
easier operationally with CT of a larger diameter. Often the platform?s crane
capacity dictates the size of CT used, which in turn reduces the working
envelope of the CT.
Some wells offshore India are completed horizontally and require
intervention using larger sizes of CT in order to gain horizontal reach and
manipulate sliding sleeves. When CT is used for these operations, the weight of
the CT reel itself is critical to the effectiveness of the overall operation
and requires proper management. Traditional methods of managing/reducing
CT-reel weight involve spooling the CT string from a boat to the platform or
joining CT sections by butt welding on the platform. Bringing the required
length of CT onboard in two or more sections and joining them with a spoolable
connector provides significant benefits over the traditional methods. The use
of just one spoolable connector can reduce the maximum CT-reel lifting weight
by typically 30 to 40% while increasing the CT size by one or two gauge
sizes.
This paper describes the results of a feasibility study performed to address
typical challenges and presents actual case histories in which a spoolable
connector was used to connect two CT strings. Required equipment was built and
mobilized so that two separate strings could be joined on the platform with the
aid of a connecting jig. Several trips were performed safely without the need
to change the spoolable connector. Specific benefits of the spoolable connector
over the traditional methods are explained. Methods to monitor the usable life
of the spoolable connector while tripping in and out of the well (Fig. 2) will
also be discussed, as well as new developments currently under way.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
694 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
8 May 2010
- Meeting paper published:
21 January 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
10 July 2010
- Manuscript approved:
27 July 2010
- Published online:
7 October 2010
- Version of record:
17 November 2010