SPE Production & Operations
Volume 26, Number 2, May 2011, pp. 185-194

SPE-128016-PA

Investigation of Effect of Fracturing Fluid on After-Closure Analysis in Gas Reservoirs

View full textPDF ( 6,037 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/128016-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/128016-PA

Citation

  • Soliman, M.Y., Miranda, C., Wang, H., and Thornton, K. 2011. Investigation of Effect of Fracturing Fluid on After-Closure Analysis in Gas Reservoirs. SPE Prod & Oper  26 (2): 185-194. SPE-128016-PA. doi: 10.2118/128016-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.3 Production Enhancement
  • 5.3.3 Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel Packing

Keywords

  • DFIT, MiniFrac, FET, Hydraulic fracturing, after closure analysis

Summary

Published techniques for analysis of after-closure fracture data usually assume single-phase flow. These procedures generally rely on the techniques developed for the analysis of buildup tests. Applying the buildup techniques implies that the injected fluid and reservoir fluid have approximately the same properties. This assumption is generally incorrect in case of minifrac tests where the injected fluid may be very different from the reservoir fluids. This situation is at an extreme when the minifrac test is conducted on a gas reservoir and the injected fluid may be a relatively high-viscosity gelled fluid.

In this paper, we review the basic theory behind after-closure analysis. Using a numerical simulator, minifrac tests are simulated and analyzed for both oil- and gas-reservoir cases where an aqueous phase is injected as a fracturing fluid. Analyses of the numerically simulated falloff data are presented. Guidelines for the analysis of such data have been developed and presented.

Field data are also presented. In one case, breakdown, step-rate, and fluid-efficiency tests (FETs) were performed on a tight gas formation and the data were analyzed. The results of using these various techniques are presented. The consistency of results validates conclusions achieved using the numerically simulated data.

View full textPDF ( 6,037 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 2 March 2010
  • Meeting paper published: 15 February 2010
  • Revised manuscript received: 10 August 2010
  • Manuscript approved: 28 November 2010
  • Published online: 17 March 2011
  • Version of record: 16 May 2011