SPE Production & Operations
Volume 26, Number 1, February 2011, pp. 55-66

SPE-130685-PA

Temperature and Salinity Effects on Drag-Reduction Characteristics of Polymers in Coiled Tubing

View full textPDF ( 1,919 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/130685-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/130685-PA

Citation

  • Shah, S.N. and Vyas, A. 2011. Temperature and Salinity Effects on Drag-Reduction Characteristics of Polymers in Coiled Tubing. SPE Prod & Oper  26 (1): 55-66. SPE-130685-PA. doi: 10.2118/130685-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.1.5 Wireline, Coiled Tubing and Telemetry

Summary

Coiled-tubing (CT) applications include drilling operations, hydraulic fracturing, well completions, removing sand or fill from wellbore, and other applications that involve pumping fluids at high temperatures and high salinity. Because of curvature effects in CT, huge pressure losses occur, limiting the maximum flow rate achieved. By adding specific chemicals known as "friction reducers" or "drag reducers" to the fluids, these pressure losses can be minimized to a great extent.

Previously, several authors have published their results for fluid flow through CT, but only a limited number of studies have been reported that relate to temperature and salinity effects on drag reduction in fluids flowing through CT.

This paper discusses an experimental study of two commonly used drag reducers--ASP-700 and ASP-820--flowing through CT with different salinities and temperatures. Both small-scale and large-scale flow loops are used in this study. The small-scale flow loop includes a 1/2-in.-outside-diameter (OD) smooth CT, while the large-scale flow loop includes 2 3/8-in. rough CT. Elevated temperature tests and salinity tests are conducted using optimum concentrations of drag reducers in fresh water, 2% KCl, and synthetic seawater.

The flow data gathered were analyzed and used to develop correlations that can predict drag reduction at different salinities and temperatures. The developed correlations show reasonable agreement with experimental data.

View full textPDF ( 1,919 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 14 April 2010
  • Meeting paper published: 23 March 2010
  • Revised manuscript received: 3 August 2010
  • Manuscript approved: 3 September 2010
  • Published online: 13 January 2011
  • Version of record: 22 February 2011