SPE Production & Operations
Volume 27, Number 2, May 2012, pp. 170-184

SPE-140138-PA

HCl/Formic In-Situ-Gelled Acids as Diverting Agents for Carbonate Acidizing

View full textPDF ( 7,645 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/140138-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140138-PA

Citation

  • Rabie, A.I., Gomaa, A.M., and Nasr-El-Din, H.A. 2012. HCl/Formic In-Situ-Gelled Acids as Diverting Agents for Carbonate Acidizing. SPE Prod & Oper  27 (2): 170-184. SPE-140138-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140138-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.3.4 Acidizing

Keywords

  • acidizing, carbonates, diversion, formic acid, HCl/formic acids

Summary

In highly heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs, several acid systems have been used to enhance acid diversion during matrix acidizing such as surfactant-based acids and in-situ-gelled acids. In-situ-gelled acids are also used to reduce leakoff rate in acid fracturing. The main acid used in this system is hydrochloric acid (HCl). However, high reaction rates and severity of corrosion problems, especially for wells completed with Cr-based tubulars, limit the use of HCl at high temperatures. On the other hand, mixing organic acids with HCl either increases the acid penetration or reduces the necessary strength of HCl and the necessary load of the corrosion inhibitors. A few studies addressed the systems that use both advantages.

The objective of this work is to investigate the behavior and the performance of different in-situ-gelled HCl/formic acid blends as diverting agents by conducting viscosity measurements and reaction-rate measurements using the rotating-disk apparatus, and through coreflood study.

Formic acid was blended with HCl, and four in-situ-gelled acids were examined. Formic acid concentration varied from 0 to 6.31 wt%, and HCl concentration ranged from 0 to 5 wt%. Pink Desert limestone was used for reaction-rate and coreflood experiments. The rotating-disk apparatus was used to measure the reaction rate at 250degF at disk rotational speeds of 100 and 1,000 rev/min. The effect of formic acid concentration and zirconium crosslinking on the reaction rate was examined. Coreflood experiments were conducted at 250°F using two different rates of injection (2 and 10 cm3/min), and the core samples were imaged using a computed-tomography (CT) scan technique after each coreflood experiment.

Increasing formic acid concentration decreased the reaction rate of in-situ-gelled HCl/formic acid with calcite at both low and high disk rotational speeds. This was confirmed by viscosity measurements, which showed that increasing formic acid concentration increased the viscosity of the live acids and decreased the viscosity of the spent acids. Coreflood results showed that increasing formic acid concentration in HCl/formic acid blends reduced acid ability for diversion. In the selected range of acid concentration and for the type of polymer and crosslinking agent used, the in-situ HCl/formic acid behaved more like gelled acid and reached a breakthrough in all coreflood experiments. The higher the formic acid concentration, the higher the pore volume of the acid required to break through.

The objective of this work is to investigate the behavior and the performance of different in-situ gelled HCl-formic acid blends as diverting agents by conducting viscosity measurements, reaction rate measurements using the rotating disk apparatus, and through core flood study.

Formic acid was blended with HCl and four in-situ gelled acids were examined. Formic acid concentration varied from 0 to 6.31 wt% and HCl concentration ranged from 0 to 5 wt%. Pink Desert limestone was utilized for reaction rate and core flood experiments. The rotating disk apparatus was used to measure the reaction rate at 250°F at disk rotational speeds of 100 and 1000 rpm. The effect of formic acid concentration and zirconium crosslinking on the reaction rate was examined. Core flood experiments were conducted at 250°F using two different rates of injection (2 and 10 cm3/min) and the core samples were imaged using a CT scan technique after each core flood experiment.

View full textPDF ( 7,645 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 4 April 2011
  • Meeting paper published: 28 March 2011
  • Revised manuscript received: 4 October 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 11 October 2011
  • Published online: 29 March 2012
  • Version of record: 1 May 2012