SPE Production & Operations
Volume 26, Number 4, November 2011, pp. 314-324

SPE-140937-PA

Review of Electrical-Submersible-Pump Surging Correlation and Models

View full textPDF ( 1,238 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/140937-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140937-PA

Citation

  • Gamboa, J. and Prado, M. 2011. Review of Electrical-Submersible-Pump Surging Correlation and Models. SPE Prod & Oper  26 (4): 314-324. SPE-140937-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140937-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.2.2 Electric Submersible Pumps
  • 5.2.4 Multiphase Pumps

Keywords

  • Surging, Performance Mapping, Two-Phase

Summary

Head deterioration observed in electrical submersible pumps (ESPs) under two-phase flow is mild until a sudden performance breakdown is observed in the pump head curve at a certain volumetric gas fraction. This critical condition is termed surging. Consequently, the head that the pump generates with two-phase flow depends on whether the stages operate under conditions before (mild performance deterioration) or after (severe performance deterioration) the surging point.

The surging, for engineering purposes, can be predicted by published correlations, but the lack of a theoretical basis is a limiting factor for their application. Mechanistic models seem to be the proper alternative. However, the poor understanding of the physical mechanism that causes the surging hinders the development of such mechanistic models. This paper reviews some of these correlations and mechanistic models by comparing the correlation predictions against experimental data acquired in a closed loop with water and air using a commercial 24-stage ESP. The data cover a wide range of volumetric gas fraction, rotational speeds, and intake pressures. As a consequence of this analysis, a new correlation has been formulated. This correlation predicts the initiation of the surging as a function of rotational speed and fluid properties.

View full textPDF ( 1,238 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 25 January 2011
  • Meeting paper published: 28 March 2011
  • Revised manuscript received: 5 May 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 22 June 2011
  • Published online: 29 September 2011
  • Version of record: 22 November 2011