SPE Production & Operations
Volume 26,
Number 4,
November 2011,
pp. 388-400
Summary
After fracture stimulation, production often rises slowly instead of showing
an early transient. This indicates either severe reduction in fracture
conductivity or reservoir damage. There is still no agreement in the industry
about the most important damage mechanisms. Work performed by Pratts and
Holditch in the 1970s showed that fracture-face damage from filtrate invasion
is unimportant unless there is permeability damage in the invaded zone of at
least 99%. New ideas have been proposed that may better explain the behavior
commonly seen in actual production data. These ideas include relative
permeability with water and gas both immobile at a given saturation
("permeability jail"), small-scale reservoir heterogeneity, and
stress-sensitive-matrix permeability at high drawdown.
Experience from the field has been contradictory. Sometimes no water is
produced back, but gas production does not appear to suffer. In other cases,
the gas rate is significantly lower than expected, but significant fracture
fluid is recovered. With the inherent coupling of fracture length and
permeability in well-test interpretation and the practical impossibility of
achieving radial flow in tight-gas reservoirs with large fracture lengths, it
has been difficult to prove any theory about the cause of poor performance from
tight gas fracture treatments. This paper shows simulation results of these
effects on post-fracture production from an unconventional (0.001-md) gas well.
Furthermore, realistic assumptions about proppant-pack cleanup show a
connection not only between poor cleanup and short effective fracture length,
but also reduction in contacted kh and connected reservoir volume. New
reservoir-simulation results are presented that show a 50% reduction of
production in the first years because of these effects in unconventional
reservoirs.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
5,268 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
15 December 2010
- Meeting paper published:
1 February 2011
- Revised manuscript received:
14 December 2010
- Manuscript approved:
14 May 2011
- Published online:
13 September 2011
- Version of record:
22 November 2011