SPE Production & Operations
Volume 21, Number 2, May 2006, pp. 260-268

SPE-84399-PA

Production and Injection Profiling Through Permanent-Downhole-Pressure-Gauge Recording During a Coiled-Tubing-Conveyed Workover Operation

View full textPDF ( 1,037 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/84399-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84399-PA

Citation

  • Ouyang, L.-B. and Sawiris, R. 2006. Production and Injection Profiling Through Permanent-Downhole-Pressure-Gauge Recording During a Coiled-Tubing-Conveyed Workover Operation. SPE Prod & Oper21 (2): 260-268. SPE-84399-PA.

Summary

Production and injection profiling through permanent-downhole-pressure-gauge (PDG) recording during a coiled-tubing (CT) -conveyed workover operation, a novel and unique application, has been proposed in the present paper. Theoretical development of the new technique is provided first. Example studies are then given to illustrate the application of the technique. Application scenarios, practical issues, and key impacting parameters have also been addressed. Finally, a field case study implementing the new technique for a long horizontal well has been performed to demonstrate how the production profiles calculated from PDG data compare closely to the results from a recent production logging survey, which was expensive and mechanically risky yet turned out to be unsatisfactory.

The technique could be applied to real-time production and injection profiling for different well configurations (vertical, horizontal, deviated, and multilateral) and bring tremendous financial benefits through replacing conventional production-logging surveys that could be cost-extensive for horizontal or multilateral wells offshore.

Introduction

Permanent downhole gauges are metering devices installed downhole to monitor well and reservoir conditions in real time. Continuous measurement of key well parameters enables engineers to observe ongoing changes in wells and make operating adjustments to optimize well performance and enhance recovery. Permanent downhole pressure gauges, the earliest and most widely installed PDGs, provide an opportunity to feature reservoir information in four dimensions rather than obtaining a glimpse or snapshot in time (Athichanagorn et al. 1999).

PDG data have a wide range of applications in the oil and gas industry (Ouyang and Kikani 2002), including reducing ambiguity and uncertainties in interpretation; detecting changes in reservoir properties; monitoring skin, permeability, and pressure drawdown over time; evaluating the performance of well completions, stimulations, or workovers; identifying reservoir connectivity; and assisting reservoir simulation and history matching, just to name a few. Nevertheless, so far no application of PDGs for production or injection profiling has been reported.

Production and injection profiling (i.e., flow profiling) through PDG recording during a CT-conveyed workover operation will be proposed in this paper. The technique could be applied to real-time production and injection profiling for different well configurations (vertical, horizontal, deviated, and multilateral) and could bring tremendous financial benefits through replacing conventional production-logging surveys that could be cost-extensive for horizontal or multilateral wells offshore.

In the present paper, theoretical development of the new technique will first be addressed. Example studies will then be provided to illustrate the application of the technique, followed by sensitivity studies performed to investigate the key influencing parameters such as wellbore size, CT outer diameter (OD), degree of eccentricity, fluid density and viscosity, production/injection rate, and others. Application scenarios and practical issues also will be discussed. Finally, a field case study implementing the new technique for a long horizontal well will be conducted to demonstrate how the production profiles from PDG data very closely match the results from a recent PLT survey that was expensive but unsatisfactory.

View full textPDF ( 1,037 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 18 February 2004
  • Revised manuscript received: 7 January 2005
  • Manuscript approved: 21 August 2005
  • Version of record: 20 May 2006