Summary
Although carbon dioxide (CO2) injection is one of the most common
enhanced-oil recovery methods that is widely used in many reservoirs, it may
change the reservoir-fluid properties and cause problems such as asphaltene
precipitation that will result in reduction of injectivity and productivity of
oil wells and plugging of wellbores and production facilities.
This paper describes the effect of a miscible CO2 flood on
asphaltene precipitation in the Bangestan reservoir of the Kupal field in
southwest Iran. The amount of asphaltene precipitation in the mixture of oil
and CO2 gas was measured by means of a PVT
(pressure/volume/temperature) test, and the mechanism of precipitation under
reservoir conditions was obtained by a high-pressure coreflood test. Then, the
experimental results were compared with those obtained from available
asphaltene-precipitation models.
Introduction
Asphaltenes are highly condensed polyaromatic-structure molecules consisting
primarily of carbon, hydrogen, and minor proportion of elements such as sulfur,
nitrogen, and oxygen.
Asphaltenes are believed to exist in the crude oil partly dissolved and
partly kept in finely dispersed colloidal-suspension form that may be
stabilized by nonpolar resin fractions of the crude (Branco et al. 2001). These
higher-molecular-weight components of crude oil are in equilibrium at reservoir
condition and may start to precipitate once the stability of the colloidal
suspension is disrupted by change in pressure or temperature during primary
depletion or introduction of miscible gas and liquids or other oilfield
operations.
When it contacts the reservoir oil, the injected CO2 can cause
changes in the fluid behavior and equilibrium conditions as well as alter the
asphaltene/resin ratio of crude oil such that it favors precipitation of
organic solids, mainly asphaltenes (Srivastava et al. 1999).
Once asphaltenes have been precipitated from the oil during CO2
flooding, they may continue to flow as suspended particles, or they may deposit
onto the rock surface causing plugging and wettability alteration of reservoir
matrix that can reduce recovery efficiency severely and cause formation
damage.
Deposition begins with adsorption of flocculated asphaltene particles onto
active sites on the rock surface (particularly onto high-specific-area clayey
minerals such as kaolinite). This is followed by a hydrodynamic retention or
trapping process of particles at the pore throats (Minssieux 1997; Ali and
Islam 1997). Deposition of solid asphaltenes causes a reduction of the pore
space available for fluids. Other formation-damage mechanisms may include
permeability reduction and alteration of rock wettability from water-wet to
oil-wet (Kamath et al. 1993; Clementz 1982). It is also possible that deposited
asphaltene particles may be retrained in the flowing oil stream because of a
mechanical-erosion or ablation effect if the interstitial velocity of the
fluids becomes high enough (Wang and Civan 2001). This effect also has also
been observed in studies of wax deposition in pipelines (Bott and Gudmundsson
1977).
Reservoirs with even minute asphaltene content are susceptible to asphaltene
precipitation not only through pressure depletion during primary recovery, but
also through composition change in fluid during gas injection (Taver et al.
1989; Nagel et al. 1990; Srivastava et al. 1999; Leontaritis et al. 1988;
Mansoori 1997). For instance, Leontaritis et al. (1992) call attention to the
Boscan crude of Venezuela that has not created any asphaltene problems although
it has more than 17% by weight of asphaltenes (Lichaa 1977).Whereas, the Hassi-
Messaoud oil has created severe asphaltene problems, although it has only a
small fraction (0.1% by weight) of asphaltenes (Haskett and Tartera 1965). In
fact, de Boer et al. (1995) have concluded that light-to-medium crudes
containing small amounts of asphaltenes may create more
asphaltene-precipitation problems during primary production. Nghiem and Coombe
(1997) explain: Heavier crudes that contain a larger amount of asphaltene have
very little asphaltene precipitation problems as they can dissolve more
asphaltene.
© 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,100 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
19 June 2006
- Meeting paper published:
12 June 2006
- Revised manuscript received:
24 April 2007
- Manuscript approved:
9 October 2007
- Version of record:
20 May 2008