SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 11, Number 3, June 2008, 590-597

SPE-102659-PA

Analytical Steady-State Solution of Single-Probe Tests in a Horizontal Well and Its Application to Estimate Horizontal and Vertical Permeabilities

View full textPDF ( 1,107 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/102659-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102659-PA

Citation

  • Sheng, J.J. 2008. Analytical Steady-State Solution of Single-Probe Tests in a Horizontal Well and Its Application to Estimate Horizontal and Vertical Permeabilities. SPE Res Eval & Eng11 (3): 590-597. SPE-102659-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.6.3 Pressure Transient Testing
  • 6.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing
  • 6.3.1 Flow in Porous Media

Summary

During a single-probe test in a vertical well, the probe of a formation tester is set horizontally against a sidewall of the borehole. In a horizontal well, the probe can be set either horizontally against a sidewall or vertically against the top or bottom wall of the borehole. When the probe is set horizontally against a sidewall, the solution for a horizontal well is the same as that for a vertical well, if the wellbore curvature is not considered (in other words, the wellbore radius is considered to be much larger than the probe radius). However, when the probe is set vertically against the top or bottom wall, the solution for a horizontal well is not available in the literature. This paper presents an analytical solution to the described problem.

The solution shows that the relationship between the pressure drop and flow rate for a single-probe test in a horizontal well depends on the geometric average of horizontal and vertical permeabilities when the probe is set vertically against the borehole. One of the important applications of the solution is to estimate horizontal and vertical permeabilities from two probe tests. If two tests are conducted at the same measured depth, with the probe set vertically in one test and horizontally in the other, two permeabilities are obtained. Then the horizontal and vertical permeabilities at the measured depth can be estimated by combining these two permeabilities.

The analytical solution is validated by numerical simulation, and the solution is shown to be the same as a published analytical solution for a vertical well in an isotropic formation. Examples to estimate horizontal and vertical permeabilities from synthetic tests are presented.

Introduction

A single-probe test is initiated when the probe of a formation-testing tool is set and sealed against a borehole wall and a measured volume of fluid is withdrawn from the formation through the probe. The test continues with a pressure buildup when fluid withdrawing is halted. The tool monitors pressure continuously throughout the test. A schematic of probe settings in a vertical well and in a horizontal well is shown in Fig. 1. During a single-probe test in a vertical well, the probe is always set horizontally against a sidewall of the borehole (Position A). The relationship (solution) between the pressure at the probe and the rate at which fluid withdraws from an anisotropic formation has been published (Dussan-V. and Sharma 1992). In a horizontal well, the probe can be set either horizontally against a sidewall (Position B) or vertically against the top (Position C) or bottom wall of the borehole. When the probe is set horizontally against a sidewall, the solution for a horizontal well is the same as that for a vertical well. However, when the probe is set vertically against the top or bottom wall, the solution for a horizontal well is not available in the literature. As more and more pretests are conducted in horizontal wells using measurement-while-drilling tools, the solution to the described problem becomes the timely need.

This paper presents the mathematical formulation and derivation of the solution to the problem for a probe test in a horizontal well, when the probe is set vertically against the top or bottom wall. The solution is validated by numerical simulation. The paper also proposes a method to determine horizontal and vertical permeabilities with the aid of this solution.

Mathematical Formulation

The paper’s objective is to determine the relationship between the pressure at the probe and the rate at which fluid withdraws from an anisotropic formation. In a vertical well when a probe is set and sealed horizontally against the sidewall of wellbore, the relationship between pressure and rate is first derived at steady-state flow, and we have found that the derived relationship can be applied to unsteady-state flow (Sheng et al. 2004a). Using a similar approach, we first derive the relationship in steady-state flow in a horizontal well, then we apply the relationship to unsteady-state probe tests where the probe is set vertically against the top or bottom wall of a horizontal wellbore.

View full textPDF ( 1,107 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 19 June 2006
  • Meeting paper published: 24 September 2006
  • Revised manuscript received: 18 July 2007
  • Manuscript approved: 20 January 2008
  • Version of record: 20 June 2008