SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 12, Number 4, August 2009, pp. 610-629

SPE-109555-PA

Reservoir Technical Limits: A Framework for Maximizing Recovery From Oil Fields

View full textPDF ( 476 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/109555-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/109555-PA

Citation

  • Smalley, P.C., Ross, B., Brown, C.E., Moulds, T.P., and SMith, M.J. 2009. Reservoir Technical Limits: A Framework for Maximizing Recovery From Oil Fields. SPE Res Eval & Eng  12 (4): 610-617. SPE-109555-PA. doi: 10.2118/109555-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.4 Primary and Enhanced Recovery Processes
  • 3.1 Asset and Portfolio Management
  • 6.7 Reserves Evaluation

Summary

The Reservoir Technical Limits (RTL™) approach described herein has proved highly effective at identifying those activities and technologies required to push oilfield recovery factors toward their maximum potential. It combines classical reservoir engineering approaches, together with knowledge of existing and novel recovery-enhancing technologies, to create a common framework for identifying specific actions to increase recovery factor. RTL is implemented in a structured workshop supported by a software toolkit.

The RTL workshop involves the cross-disciplinary field team (in-depth field knowledge), external technical experts (challenge, cross-fertilization), and trained facilitation. The software toolkit encourages innovation in a structured and reproducible manner and documents the outcomes in a consistent format. The RTL conceptual framework represents a recovery factor as the product of four efficiency factors: (1) pore-scale displacement (microscopic efficiency of the recovery process); (2) drainage (connectedness to a producer); (3) sweep (movement of oil to producers within the drained volume); and (4) cut-offs (losses related to end of field life/access). RTL encourages identification of new "opportunities," specific activities or projects that, if implemented, increase one or more efficiency factor, and thus increase recovery relative to the current field Depletion Plan. New ideas are stimulated by comparing current efficiency values with the effects of successful prescreened activities from analogue fields.The identified opportunities are validated by benchmarking: (a) internally, comparing recovery factors derived from summing the opportunity volumes with recovery factors derived from the expected efficiency factor increments; and (b) externally, comparing with analogue fields.

The result is a prioritized list of validated opportunities and an understanding of how each activity affects the reservoir to increase recovery. The opportunities (and any required new technologies) are valued in terms of the resultant incremental barrels. The RTL approach is a significant innovation, because it provides a systematic framework to: (a) identify new recovery-increasing activities across a portfolio of fields; (b) engender ownership of these activities by the individual field teams; and (c) identify the technology requirements to progress the opportunities. Now, having been implemented in more than 200 fields, this systematic approach has enabled opportunity descriptions/values and technology requirements to be compared consistently across all fields, thereby improving project prioritization and focusing corporate technology development and deployment onto the highest impact areas.

View full textPDF ( 476 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 23 July 2007
  • Meeting paper published: 11 November 2007
  • Revised manuscript received: 4 March 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 7 March 2009
  • Published online: 31 July 2009
  • Version of record: 9 September 2009