Summary
A geocellular model contains millions of gridblocks and needs to be upscaled
before the model can be used as an input for flow simulation. Available
techniques for upgridding vary from simple methods such as proportional
fractioning to more complicated methods such as maintaining heterogeneities
through variance calculations. All these methods are independent of the flow
process for which simulation is going to be used, and are independent of well
configuration. We propose a new upgridding method that preserves the pressure
profile at the upscaled level.
It is well established that the more complex the flow process, the more
detailed the level of heterogeneity needed in the simulation model. In general,
ideal upscaling is the process that preserves the "pressure profile" from the
fine-scale model under the applicable flow process. In our method, we upgrid
the geological model using simple flow equations in porous media. However, it
should be remembered that to obtain a better match between fine scale and
coarse scale, we also need to use appropriate upscaling of the reservoir
properties.
The new method is currently developed for single-phase flow; however, we
used it for both single-phase and two-phase flows for 2D and 3D cases. The
method differs fundamentally from the other methods that try to preserve
heterogeneities. In those methods, gridblocks are combined that have similar
velocities (or other properties) by assuming constant pressure drop across the
blocks. Instead, we combine the gridblocks that have similar pressure profiles,
although to release some of our assumptions such as having constant velocities
in gridblocks, we balance our equation with the K2 term. The
procedure is analytical and, hence, very efficient, but preserves the pressure
profile in the reservoir. The gridblocks (or layers) are combined in a way so
that the difference between fine- and coarse-scale pressure profiles is
minimized. In addition, we also propose two new criteria that allow us to
choose the optimum number of layers more accurately so that a critical level of
heterogeneity is preserved. These criteria provide insight into the overall
level of heterogeneity in the reservoir and the effectiveness of the layering
design.
We compare the results of our method with proportional layering and the King
et al. method (King et al. 2006) and show that, for the same number of layers,
the proposed method captures the results of the fine-scale model better. We
show that the layer merging not only depends on the variation in the
permeability between the gridblocks (K2 term), but also on
the relative magnitude of the permeability values by combining
1/K2 and K2 terms.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,328 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
2 July 2008
- Meeting paper published:
22 September 2008
- Revised manuscript received:
10 November 2009
- Manuscript approved:
8 December 2009
- Published online:
8 June 2010
- Version of record:
22 June 2010