SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 13, Number 1, February 2010, pp. 10-23

SPE-118969-PA

Feedback Controllers for the Simulation of Field Processes

View full textPDF ( 1,294 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/118969-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118969-PA

Citation

  • Güyagüler, B., Papadopoulos, A.T., and Philpot, J.A. 2010. Feedback Controllers for the Simulation of Field Processes. SPE Res Eval & Eng  13 (1): 10-23. SPE-118969-PA. doi: 10.2118/118969-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.5.1 Simulator Development

Summary

Control systems with feedback controllers are useful in reservoir simulation because they enable the maintenance of desired operating conditions of a field. This, in turn, helps to establish the value of implementing automated mechanisms in the field, and also in determining long-term field operating strategies. A generic controller framework is constructed within a reservoir simulator that enables the usage of different kinds of controller algorithms for managing a variety of field processes. In this study, three field processes are considered. First, average pressure within a reservoir region is maintained by adjusting the voidage-replacement ratio between a group of injectors and producers. Second, control systems are used for the prevention of gas/water coning for single and multiple wells. Finally, the average temperature within a reservoir region is maintained at a critical value by controlling flow into the formation, so as to operate with the desired mobility of heavy oil. Traditional proportional, integral, derivative (PID) controllers, as well as linear and nonlinear fuzzy controllers, are considered. The advantages and disadvantages of the approaches are discussed. Tuning control systems is a difficult process in practice. Several methods for tuning the parameters of these controllers are investigated, and rule-of-thumb values are suggested in this study. Synthetic and real reservoir models are used.

View full textPDF ( 1,294 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 3 November 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 2 February 2009
  • Revised manuscript received: 23 April 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 8 May 2009
  • Published online: 16 February 2010
  • Version of record: 24 February 2010