Summary
Flow around the wellbore of gas/condensate systems, when pressure drops
below dewpoint, is controlled by complex interaction of capillary, viscous, and
inertial forces. Hence, it is challenging to determine accurately
gas/condensate relative permeability (kr) that is affected by
the relative impact of these competing forces.
There are a number of reports demonstrating kr of high permeability rocks
affected by both coupling [the increase of kr as velocity
increases and/or interfacial tension (IFT) decreases] and inertia (i.e., the
reduction of kr as velocity increases) for these low IFT
systems. However, there is little information on this subject for
low-permeability rocks.
In this work, different series of steady-state kr values
for a 3.9-md sandstone reservoir rock with a porosity of 6% are reported. These
kr data sets have been measured experimentally at three IFT
levels below 1 mNm−1 and five velocity levels below 200
md−1.
The results indicate that at the highest IFT, inertia is dominant at low
condensate-/gas-flow-rate ratio(CGFR) at test conditions, whereby
kr reduces with increasing velocities. At higher CGFR, an
increase in kr is observed because of the dominant effect of
coupling. At lower IFT, the negative impact of inertia on kr
as velocity increases is observed at all CGFR. Jamiolahmady et al. (2008) have
recently reported kr of highly conductive propped fractures
showing a more pronounced effect of inertia at lower IFT, but this is the first
report of such behavior for low permeability rocks. These kr
measurements are also compared with the corresponding predicted
kr using the generalized kr correlation
recently developed by Jamiolahmady et al. (2009). The correlation expresses the
combined effect of coupling and inertia with universal parameters. The unique
contribution of inertia, as observed in the experiments and predicted by the
correlation, is attributed mainly to the high single-phase inertial factor of
the rock and fluid properties of the flowing phases.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
685 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
13 December 2008
- Meeting paper published:
15 March 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
18 June 2009
- Manuscript approved:
2 July 2009
- Published online:
25 March 2010
- Version of record:
20 April 2010