Summary
The Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) reservoir is one of five prolific oil
reservoirs in the giant Wafra oil field. The Maastrichtian oil production is
largely from subtidal dolomites at an average depth of 2,500 ft. Carbonate
deposition occurred on a very gently dipping, shallow, arid, and restricted
ramp setting that transitioned between normal marine conditions to restricted
lagoonal environments. The average porosity of the reservoir interval is
approximately 15%, although productive zones have porosity values up to 30-40%.
The average permeability of the reservoir interval is approximately 30 md.
Individual core plugs have measured permeability up to 1,200 md.
Efforts to predict sedimentary facies from well logs in carbonate reservoirs
is difficult because of the complex carbonate sedimentary facies structures,
strong diagenetic overprint, and challenging log analysis in part owing to the
presence of vugs and fractures. In the study, a workflow including (1) core
description preprocessing, (2) log- and core-data cleanup, and (3)
probabilistic-neural-network (PNN) facies analysis was used to predict facies
from log data accurately. After evaluation of a variety of statistical
approaches, a PNN-based approach was used to predict facies from well-log data.
The PNN was selected as a tool because it has the capability to delineate
complex nonlinear relationships between facies and log data. The PNN method was
shown to outperform multivariate statistical algorithms and, in this study,
gave good prediction accuracy (above 70%). The prediction uncertainty was
quantified by two probabilistic logs--discriminant ability and overall
confidence. These probabilistic logs can be used to evaluate the prediction
uncertainty during interpretation. Lithofacies were predicted for 15 key wells
in the Wafra Maastrichtian reservoir and were effectively used to extend the
understanding of the Maastrichtian stratigraphy, depositional setting, and
facies distribution.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,346 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
29 October 2009
- Meeting paper published:
4 October 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
5 July 2010
- Manuscript approved:
11 October 2010
- Published online:
21 February 2011
- Version of record:
21 February 2011