SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 13,
Number 3,
June 2010,
pp. 496-508
Summary
This paper presents the application of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF)
method to the integration of well-test data into heterogeneous reservoir models
generated from geological and geophysical data. EnKF does not require computing
the gradient of an objective function and, hence, can be applied easily with
any reservoir simulator, and more importantly, it is far more efficient than a
gradient-based history-matching procedure when the forward model is represented
by a reservoir simulator. In the procedure for integrating pressure-transient
data considered here, the static geological/geophysical data are assumed to be
encapsulated in a multivariate probability-density function (pdf) characterized
by a prior mean and covariance for the joint distribution of the porosity and
permeability fields. Because the prior mean of the property fields obtained
from the core and log data can sometimes be erroneous, a partially doubly
stochastic model is applied to account for the uncertainty of the prior mean.
In the doubly stochastic model, a correction to the prior mean is adjusted
together with the heterogeneous field during history matching. The method is
tested with synthetic heterogeneous single-layer and two-layer reservoirs.
Excellent data matches are obtained with EnKF in a small fraction of the time
that would be required for a gradient-based history-matching process, and the
observed data fall within the uncertainty bounds of the ensemble data
predictions. In the layered-reservoir case, the uncertainty in rock-property
fields is reduced further by integration of production-log data (layer flow
rates). We show that problems of statistical inconsistency and poor data
matches that are sometimes encountered when matching production data with EnKF
do not occur when matching pressure data with the EnKF implementation used
here. This undoubtedly occurs because the dynamical system (reservoir-simulator
equations) is much more nearly linear for the single-phase-flow problems
considered here than for multiphase-flow cases.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
996 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
31 July 2009
- Meeting paper published:
5 October 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
8 December 2009
- Manuscript approved:
16 December 2009
- Published online:
8 June 2010
- Version of record:
22 June 2010