SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 14, Number 3, June 2011, pp. 299-309

SPE-127563-PA

Systematic Surveillance Techniques for a Large Miscible WAG Flood

View full textPDF ( 1,034 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/127563-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/127563-PA

Citation

  • Panda, M., Nottingham, D., and Lenig, D. 2011. Systematic Surveillance Techniques for a Large Miscible WAG Flood. SPE Res Eval & Eng  14 (3): 299-309. SPE-127563-PA. doi: 10.2118/127563-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.4 Primary and Enhanced Recovery Processes
  • 6.4.7 Miscible Methods
  • 6.3.3 Conformance Improvement

Keywords

  • Surveillance of WAG floods

Summary

Miscible water-alternating-gas (WAG) flooding has proven to be an attractive enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) method the world over. Successful WAG floods can yield significant additional oil recovery over waterflooding.

WAG floods are complex in nature since reduction of residual oil in the pore spaces depends on mass transfer. Optimizing miscibile contact between the injected gas and the reservoir oil over a large rock volume is challenging. This challenge is more manageable in a small-scale pilot flood or a coreflood than in a large field implementation. Numerical-simulation efforts can provide guidance to designing an optimal flood. However, the field application will often reveal challenges that are not discovered in the pilot stage or by the full-field simulation model because the geologic properties and heterogeneity of the reservoir rock are not accurately represented.

Integrated surveillance of a WAG flood is the only means to determine whether the flood is working efficiently and the planned additional recovery will be delivered. A well-implemented surveillance plan allows timely intervention to improve the efficiency of an underperforming WAG flood.

This paper presents a systematic approach for applying EOR surveillance tools and methods in large miscible WAG floods in the Ivishak reservoirs at the Prudhoe Bay and Eileen West End (EWE) of the North Slope, Alaska. Highlights of these surveillance methods are (1) designed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team, (2) based on proven theory and corroborated with field data, (3) requires easily obtainable and relatively inexpensive field data and analysis, and (4) applied from fault block down to zone levels. Implementation of these tools has helped to identify the efficiency of flood patterns and areas of poor performance, which then can be modified through infill drilling, well recompletion, or WAG-ratio modification to maximize EOR recovery.

© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers

View full textPDF ( 1,034 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 28 January 2010
  • Meeting paper published: 28 June 2010
  • Revised manuscript received: 5 January 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 19 January 2011
  • Published online: 24 May 2011
  • Version of record: 7 June 2011