SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 14,
Number 4,
August 2011,
pp. 413-422
Summary
Waterflooding is among the oldest and perhaps most economical of
oil-recovery processes to extend field life and increase ultimate oil recovery
from naturally depleting reservoirs. Today, organizations have to strive for
lean and efficient technologies and processes to maximize profits when looking
deeper into their reservoir portfolios in order to identify additional
waterflooding opportunities. Time and information constraints can limit the
depth and rigor of such a screening evaluation. Time is reflected by the effort
of screening a vast number of reservoirs for the applicability of implementing
a waterflood, whereas information is reflected by the availability and quality
of data (consistency of measured and modeled data with the inherent rules of a
petroleum system) from which to extract significant knowledge necessary to make
good development decisions.
A new approach to screening a large number of reservoirs uses a wide variety
of input information and satisfies a number of constraints such as physical,
financial, geopolitical, and human constraints. In a fully stochastic workflow
that includes stochastic back population of incomplete data sets, stochastic
proxy models over time series, and stochastic ranking methods using Bayesian
belief networks (BBNs), more than 1,500 reservoirs were screened for additional
recovery potential with waterflooding operations. The objective of the
screening process was to reduce the number of reservoirs by one order of
magnitude to approximately 100 potential candidates that are suitable for a
more detailed evaluation. Numerical models were used to create response
surfaces as surrogate reservoir models that capture the sensitivity and
uncertainty of the influencing input parameters on the output. Reservoir
uncertainties were combined with expert knowledge and environmental variables
and were used as proxy model states in the formulation of objective functions.
The input parameters were initiated and processed in a stochastic manner
throughout the presented work. The output is represented by a ranking of
potential waterflood candidates.
The benefit of this approach is in the inclusion of a wide range of
influencing parameters while at the same time speeding up the screening process
without jeopardizing the quality of the results.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
794 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
19 August 2010
- Meeting paper published:
27 October 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
20 March 2011
- Manuscript approved:
5 April 2011
- Published online:
28 July 2011
- Version of record:
15 August 2011